By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Blah blah This gen will be the last blah blah Pachter

Pachter is a joke



Around the Network
Michelasso said:
I've found a great way to be right when talking about video games: I read what the Pachter idiot says and I predict the opposite!


So all consoles will sell zero units?



JRPGfan said:
fathinos said:

Another thing is if Microsoft (and even Sony) move to a Cloud based console (although i do see them releasing at least another one) people will see these consoles as a very good and even better option.

I dont believe a Cloud based console will ever really compete well against physical hardware you own and run in your house.

It ll be a downgrade to what a physical product can produce results wise (graphically & lag/delay wise).

 

The only reason for such a device would be price, it could be cheap as hell for consomers to download a app and have a "console".

Thats about it. I still think a cloud based solution would get tough competition from physical hardware, and mainly end up as a cheapo solution that caters more to the lowest denominator.

 

I ll put money on cell phones becomeing powerfull enough to be mainstream gameing devices in the home,

and that eventually we ll all be gameing on our phones. To me this is much more likely than a cloud based console.

 

The future of gameing could be the Sony Phone vs the Xbox Phone.

 

I think the first to launch a cloud based console gets a kick to the nuts and fails horribly (compaired to the physical hardware console its competeing against).

That's the reason why cloud is still not a viable option. But talking about the future (say 2020) with 5G networks capable of more than a gig/s things are going to be different.

And that is why people always talk about cloud as the future. The thing that makes it a stron contender is actually what it can do power wise. It will be much better than a physical console (as you would have powerfull server at your disposal) and it will be upgradable. Take in exemple the xbox game Crackdown3 which promises 100% destructible environment but only online (using clound technology).

The other thing is it will be a very good solution against piracy.



If the Wii U sells 20m I'll swallow my own head.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

danielrdp said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

Lol what?


Really? You should Lol XB1 selling 100m  

Exactly.  Wii U most likely won't reach 20M, but it sure as hell will be closer to 20M than the XBO will be to 100M.  XBO will be lucky to make it much past 60M.



Around the Network
SWORDF1SH said:
He actually can talk sense when talks about the business side of things but his predictions most of the time are embarrassingly wrong. This is no exception. I wonder sometimes if he justs likes to troll.

X1 100 million? Nope, I even doubt PS4 doing that. This gen will be much more front loaded and probably shorter. My guess 50m X1, 90M PS4.

I'll give you the shorter, though, it'll only be by a year or so.  But, front loaded?  How do you come to that conclusion when the PS4 is up YOY without a pricecut after almost 2 years?  This gen will not be more frontloaded than any other.  And sales are going to explode again once the price drops to $299, and then again (though probably to a smaller extent) at $199.



X1 100 millions? Like an user above said this doesn't make any sense, why would any of the big 3 give up on console gaming, especially Microsoft when that number would make the X1 their most successful console ever? seriously, someone report Pachter for trolling :^)



It seems he's really good at trolling people for the clicks.



Patcher as wrong as usual...

About unified platform and cloud... I believe it will be possible to have decent games with weak HW next gen, but you won't see it being better and stronger than physical HW... anyone expecting internet or any derivation being faster than local machines for any considerable time and cost efficiency won't be very happy.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Great, he jinxed it. Now X1 will never reach 100m :(



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.