Frenchie from Normandy here(y'know, where Americans arrived on the D Day). From my perspective,
I love America, they can self-mock about clichés and stuff when other countries would be offended.

When it comes to politics, I don't know, France is guilty of either electing someone they'll then regret for being(seemingly)lazy, not doing anything, or voting for a greedy hyperactive extremist, thus regretting it also.

Each countries probably have their flaws hey...

Don't worry, we think that way about being the world's policemen too.

Too (loosely) quote Ron Paul - "We (America) need to embrace the wealth of a nuetral country, instead of enduring the poverty that comes from being an empire."

I see.....

There are at least  seven continent models accepted/known universally, but only 2 of them actually consider North/South America as separate continents.

America is considered as a single continent since its discovery, it was only later, in the 17th century, that some maps started to depict North and South America, for some unknow reason (probably due to colonization matters)

Even so, it´s still a country and a continent with the same name. It can get confusing, sometimes.

I understand your point, but I think that it's even the otherway around that USA is the more dangarous country. They are not acting/involving in issues if they can't gain or get controll over a region. No country govnerment would just attact a certain dictator because it's for the people of that country! If you really think that any country would do that you are pretty naive. Ofcourse the govnerment wants us to be for involvement, so they do all kind of propoganda to convince you, your country needs to be involved!

I did make that point. There are definitly economic interests at play. The US is not always right at all. But i don't think a world without the US would be a better world. It would become a more dangerous one. Even with economic interests, they are deterrents for bigger threats. Small countries and how they intervene is highly debatable and i'm not defending it in any way. I'm just against isolitionism because that was an enabler for large wars to happen in the past.

Kosovo is a great example of that. A horrible genocide was prevented.

Great country on the whole. Just too much religion and too many guns.

Kosovo is a great example of what is wrong with involvement of Europe and USA! Our countries (USA and most of the European countries) created Yuguslavia which was a disaster. We shouldn't want to create countries in areas where the culture between the groups is too big, this always turns out in to conflicts and the normal people in those countries are the ones who pay the bill! Ofcourse when the war broke out in the nineties we had to act and try to handle everything over there better as we (our countries) all looked the other way when the first problem started with Bosnia and because of that the total area was getting smaller and bigger groups which wanted to fight/eliminate each other! So like I said before, in my opinion all the casualties are a result of the involvement of the other countries. Ofcourse in that area didn't were on good terms with each other from around end of 19th cent and the WWI and II have increased the hate feeling between the countries.(which where put together). And there are more examples of this!

WW1 & WW2 sealed the USA's fate that isolationist stuff was over with since the USA was a Superpower, world police/defenders of Democracy. Sad but true.

Are we talking about just the US here or globally in the US?