By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - IGN gives Devils Third a 3.5

Masterpiece confirmed



Around the Network
DerNebel said:
Utterly pathetic that some people still don't want to accept that this is trash. We get it, it's a Wii U exclusive and you wanted it to be good since it was announced as such, so now you have to defend it till the end of days.


I couldn't care less if it was exclusive.  I saw a playable hot chick in one the previews. I buy every game with a hot chick in it!

 

..... But alas, I will not be buying this. :(



d21lewis said:
DerNebel said:
Utterly pathetic that some people still don't want to accept that this is trash. We get it, it's a Wii U exclusive and you wanted it to be good since it was announced as such, so now you have to defend it till the end of days.


I couldn't care less if it was exclusive.  I saw a playable hot chick in one the previews. I buy every game with a hot chick in it!

 

..... But alas, I will not be buying this. :(

Well at least you're not trying to sell the game as some amazing underrated gem. If you want the game to fap to, then more power to you. Lol



DerNebel said:
d21lewis said:
DerNebel said:
Utterly pathetic that some people still don't want to accept that this is trash. We get it, it's a Wii U exclusive and you wanted it to be good since it was announced as such, so now you have to defend it till the end of days.


I couldn't care less if it was exclusive.  I saw a playable hot chick in one the previews. I buy every game with a hot chick in it!

 

..... But alas, I will not be buying this. :(

Well at least you're not trying to sell the game as some amazing underrated gem. If you want the game to fap to, then more power to you. Lol


I have Onechanbara Z. I guess it will have to do.



Despite its obvious flaws im enjoying it. I'm not trying to defend it because its wii u exclusive, its genuinely entertaining in a cheesy way. Found a good bunch of people in the online community and setting up clans etc. I imagine most people would find this to be a bad game, I'm not one of them.



Around the Network
d21lewis said:
DerNebel said:
Utterly pathetic that some people still don't want to accept that this is trash. We get it, it's a Wii U exclusive and you wanted it to be good since it was announced as such, so now you have to defend it till the end of days.


I couldn't care less if it was exclusive.  I saw a playable hot chick in one the previews. I buy every game with a hot chick in it!

 

..... But alas, I will not be buying this. :(


Christ, you Vita collection must be bigger than mine!

I have to say this game looked really interesting to me before launch. The reception so far has really dampened it though. Does it play like a PS2 era action game? As I could see some enjoyment to be had from that and would explain a good chunk of the panning.



RIP Dad 25/11/51 - 13/12/13. You will be missed but never forgotten.

Truth be told, if it ever does come to the United States, I'll probably still buy it. I'll just buy it for cheap. I've had a lot of fun with mediocre games like X-Blades and Hunted. I know they're bad but for some reason, that's what makes them good.



Deserves the score



REQUIESCAT IN PACE

I Hate REMASTERS

I Hate PLAYSTATION PLUS

generic-user-1 said:
TheObserver said:
generic-user-1 said:
jason1637 said:
generic-user-1 said:


its seems like a realy bad review...


I dont trust reviewers often and listen to gamers but i heard from some peopel who even played the game that it is bad.

i dont care if they give good scores or not, the review is just bad, like realy bad, i dont realy care for this game, looked great at first but i guess they toned it down to much for the wiiu audience. 

The review has as much effort put into it as the game.lol

But reallythe game has a 42 on metacritic so seems not many thought it was good.

the review is full of bias against this kind of games, it could have been a great game and the rewiew wouldnt be much different. 

there are to many bad reviewer out there, and this is one of them, not polygon bad, but still realy bad.

and for the 42 on meta, i guess the game deserved it, its way to toned down and teen friendly, they should have went all out with the violence and gore.

peopel like gore, a guy named AL(L) gore even was elected as president of the usa(but got scammed out of it)


Um, the game is still rated M for mature and it still has a ton of gore in it... so yeah that part is bull $#!t. Itagaki said it was toned down he was referring to the difficulty not the violence. Frankly you have uet to say one thing that makes me think you are not biased. Which is fine really I hope you are very happy with this game. Frankly though this game has the same stink on it as Duke Nukem Forever and DaiKatana.



Check the link below. (note to Admins: it's not really porn please don't ban me!)

 

Boberkun said:
ohmylanta1003 said:


The general consensus is that it is. If we don't go by that, what do we go by? If you want to like it, go ahead. But from everything we've seen, it's not a good game.

The general consensus from incompetent journalists? Both japanese and european players love it. I beat the game on the "Hardcore" mode and I love it too.

User scores reliable confirmed. 



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'