By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

As always it's the internet's conspiracy to bring down Sony.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network

I thought dualshockers was on metacritic?



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

vivster said:
As always it's the internet's conspiracy to bring down Sony.

Disregard everything i previously said. This is the correct answer



NZGamer's on metacritic.



There has to be a cut off somewhere. Should youtubers be included as well? What if those sites gave the game a less than favorable score? Would you still be in favor for them to be included?



Around the Network
Zekkyou said:
Samus Aran said:
patronmacabre said:
Gamerankings is the other aggregate reviewer if you don't like Metacritic. Their current score for Until Dawn is 79.94%.

But seriously, your enjoyment of a game shouldn't be contingent on a single point. When using Metacritic, I personally to group certain scores together to judge the quality of a game (so, I personally think games that score between 77-82, 83-86, 87-90, and 91+ tend to be indistinguishable in quality, and how much I would enjoy that particular game comes down to personal preference.)

I liked Splatoon, Yoshi's Woolly World and DKC: TF a lot more than Bayonetta 2 and Rayman Legends.

I expect so did some reviewers. That doesn't say much as to whether their metascore's are accurate or not though, at least within a reasonable range. Stand alone opinions don't mean much to a generalized view point after all.

I expect that the vast majority of gamers liked those games better than Bayonetta 2 and Rayman Legends.

10-15 points difference isn't reasonable at all. Even Disney Infinity 3.0 scored better than those 3 games despite most content being locked behind expensive plastic toys (and the game being super bland and generic). I guess Disney pays more for ads.



Alot of those aren't important enough sources



I just started playing,



Samus Aran said:
Zekkyou said:

I expect so did some reviewers. That doesn't say much as to whether their metascore's are accurate or not though, at least within a reasonable range. Stand alone opinions don't mean much to a generalized view point after all.

I expect that the vast majority of gamers liked those games better than Bayonetta 2 and Rayman Legends.

10-15 points difference isn't reasonable at all. Even Disney Infinity 3.0 scored better than those 3 games despite most content being locked behind expensive plastic toys. I guess Disney pays more for ads.

Even if we ignore how silly it is to try and argue against the validity of generalized scores based on nothing but what an individual 'expects', unless you believe that all games are reviewed with the same audience in mind, that argument is redundant anyway. Zelda consistently out reviews CoD, yet i 'expect' the majority would rather play the latter.



Game is really good. I suggest you buy it if you enjoy horror.