By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Devil's Third Review Thread - Metascore 40 (17 Reviews)

Remember the time where people thought that this game will be a cool Wii U game. ^^



Around the Network
AZWification said:

it's funny how this works. Tecmo's first Ninja Gaiden game without Itagaki sucked balls and Itagaki's first game without Tecmo also sucks balls!


Ninja Gaiden 3 was badass actually.



"Say what you want about Americans but we understand Capitalism.You buy yourself a product and you Get What You Pay For."  

- Max Payne 3

Nintendo conspiracy? Or simply not a good game? I choose to believe the second one, from everything I've seen of it, it has been looking really bad from the start.

HintHRO: The Witcher 3 is also hard and requires actual skill and tactics on the players end, that didn't stop it from scoring really well. And a 33 meta cannot be explained by that point alone at any rate. You don't place in the bottom 10 on any platform if it's merely an issue with skill (and I hardly think that most reviewers are too unskilled to finish most games at any rate).
If reviewers could handle the Souls series; I'm sure this is a breeze.



I dont trust these reviews, i am pretty sure the game is okay. It has more content and value than until dawn for example and better graphics than gears remaster. Metacritic is not reliable theydont even allow japanese, korean, taiwanese, russian, arabic or latin american review sites to take part in the score. Just look at the sites they have they are all western, most noticebly anglo american sites



Dr.Vita said:
Remember the time where people thought that this game will be a cool Wii U game. ^^


You really loves to annoy Wii U gamers, right? ^^

Well, that was kinda expected.



Around the Network

I'm actually starting to look forward to friday now.



Up to 36 now (12 reviews) at a 3/5. There's hope yet!



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Ruler said:

I dont trust these reviews, i am pretty sure the game is okay. It has more content and value than until dawn for example and better graphics than gears remaster. Metacritic is not reliable theydont even allow japanese, korean, taiwanese, russian, arabic or latin american review sites to take part in the score. Just look at the sites they have they are all western, most noticebly anglo american sites

I can honestly not figure out if this post is serious.



The bias in the defense is really thick in here. It's almost like a game can't just be a bad game these days. Must there always be an agenda?



DerNebel said:
Ruler said:

I dont trust these reviews, i am pretty sure the game is okay. It has more content and value than until dawn for example and better graphics than gears remaster. Metacritic is not reliable theydont even allow japanese, korean, taiwanese, russian, arabic or latin american review sites to take part in the score. Just look at the sites they have they are all western, most noticebly anglo american sites

I can honestly not figure out if this post is serious.

me neither...

but anyway i remember being hyped a lot for this game back in 2009 (it looked really good) and when it went Wii U exclusive i thought "well thats a shame but at the same time it gives me another reason to buy a Wii U", but now... well (if the reviews hold true) i guess if i ever buy a Wii U it will be for Xeno X, Bayo 2 and W101.