ArchangelMadzz said:
|
13th Amendment says no. When he said "original" he meant the current constitution with its amendments.
ArchangelMadzz said:
|
13th Amendment says no. When he said "original" he meant the current constitution with its amendments.
ArchangelMadzz said:
|
how does "all men are created equal" mean legitimisation of slavery?
sc94597 said:
|
Ahhh I mis understood. I took the word 'original' and thought he meant Original, instead of 'current'.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'
Ka-pi96 said: Why? What change is so important and so large that it can't just be done through an ammendment? And perhaps more importantly how would anybody get all of the states to agree to it? |
He... the political system? The amendment about firearms? Not everyone would agree about it, but cmon... This is archaic at best.
ArchangelMadzz said:
|
Yeah he meant "original" versus whatever new constitution would be made as proposed by the thread creator. Since there is only one and has only been one U.S Constitution ratified (with ammendments) the current constitution is also the original. This is opposed with, for example, my state - Pennsylvania - having had four constitutions since the U.S constitution was ratified. The current Pennsylvania constitution is not the original.
guiduc said:
He... the political system? The amendment about firearms? Not everyone would agree about it, but cmon... This is archaic at best. |
Most people support the second amendment, so it would probably still exist in a new constitution.
sc94597 said:
|
Yes, it's rooted deep in their traditions, even though a lot of countries are absolutely against it.
No this constitution garanties the democracy of the usa
REQUIESCAT IN PACE
I Hate REMASTERS
I Hate PLAYSTATION PLUS
o_O.Q said:
|
That was asked from 1789 to 1861, people had a difference of opinion on the answer.
Nymeria said:
|
my point is that yes people even the ones that composed the constitution to begin with may have engaged in slavery, but regardless the constitution itself condemns slavery