KingdomHeartsFan said:
|
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2089464/three-year-27-000-drive-study-reveals-the-most-reliable-hard-drive-makers.html
Be careful what you find on the internet - not everything is as it seems.
"Backblaze said this particular model is pretty bad, but it cautions not to read too much into it. The company received these specific drives as warranty replacements, so they were probably refurbished with wear and tear on them by the time they met Backblaze’s HDD taskmasters."
"Then there’s cost. The only thing holding Backblaze back from going with all Hitachi drives was the price, which was one reason why the company sticks with Seagate drives."
"Your risk of a complete hard drive failure over the long-term might be higher with Seagate than Hitachi, Backblaze's numbers suggest at first glance but there’s no guarantee that will happen. In fact, Backblaze's earlier study showed that hard drives are actually pretty reliable overall over a four-year stretch, even in a server farm. And hey, a number of individual Seagate models actually had a longer average age than Hitachi products!"
So the results were based on used drives (and it doesn't mention how old they were prior to being tested), the company doing the testing uses Seagate drives even though their "results" say they are less reliable, and the company says not to trust these results because their model is "pretty bad".
Personally, I have been using Seagate drives with very few issues.