DerNebel said:
I thought 1 1/2 hours? |
I read in neogaf that the reviews coming in less than an hour, unless something changed :(
DerNebel said:
I thought 1 1/2 hours? |
I read in neogaf that the reviews coming in less than an hour, unless something changed :(
Is this their highest rated game?
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/tumble
well......
lol
lonerism said: Is this their highest rated game? http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/tumble well...... lol |
Great contribution to the thread. You should be proud of yourself.
First review 8.2/10
http://www.nukemdukem.net/until-dawn-review/
The PS5 Exists.
GribbleGrunger said:
Great contribution to the thread. You should be proud of yourself. |
It was a silly question, sorry
I'm really excited to play it :)
9/10
http://gamecloud.net.au/review/until-dawn
9.8/10
http://www.xgn.nl/review/until-dawn-review
8/10
http://m.ps4.mmgn.com/until-dawn-review
8/10
http://www.powerpyx.com/reviews/until-dawn-review.html
The PS5 Exists.
Can Metacritic not do basic math? If you add up all 45 review scores and divide by 45 (which was how I was taught to get an average ) you get: 79.55
Yet the metacritic score is showing as 78. WTH?
Btw if you remove that ridiculous "look at me, I'm controversial!!" score of 40 by Digital Spy, the average score goes to: 80.45
ratchet426 said: Can Metacritic not do basic math? If you add up all 45 review scores and divide by 45 (which was how I was taught to get an average ) you get: 79.55 Yet the metacritic score is showing as 78. WTH? Btw if you remove that ridiculous "look at me, I'm controversial!!" score of 40 by Digital Spy, the average score goes to: 80.45 |
I think Metacritic should remove/not use any extremely high/low scores that are outside the average window. 40 sounds very low compared to what is being given... ends up being click bait.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.