By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - So, 'The Man From U.N.C.L.E.' Bombed harder than the Fantastic Four, are you surprised?

binary solo said:
Signalstar said:
It didn't bomb at all. It skews towards an older audience who don't rush out to see movies at the theaters. It only cost $75 million (minus marketing) which is a lot less than Fantastic Four. It should make money in the end.

Very doubtful. It will need to get about $150 million globally to break even (probably more),


Just courius - where did you get that figure of $150 million from? It seems marketing was poor, so there probably spend way less that production budget for marketing. 

Anyway, today or tommorow the movie has break even it's production budget, so it's now "only" has to fill marketing budget and make some profit.



Around the Network

Best action/adventure movie of the summer IMO. A shame.

The name doesn't work for kids today, they didn't get it. Even the TV series was originally supposed to be called "Ian Fleming's Solo" (yes the sam Ian Fleming of 007 fame).

That probably would've worked better as a name.

Obviously Guy Ritchie is a fan of the TV series, it was very popular, but that was in the 60s so it doesn't work with modern movie goers. 

Quality wise IMO it was as good as Kingsmen, I thought a little better actually.



deadeyye said:
binary solo said:
Signalstar said:
It didn't bomb at all. It skews towards an older audience who don't rush out to see movies at the theaters. It only cost $75 million (minus marketing) which is a lot less than Fantastic Four. It should make money in the end.

Very doubtful. It will need to get about $150 million globally to break even (probably more),


Just courius - where did you get that figure of $150 million from? It seems marketing was poor, so there probably spend way less that production budget for marketing. 

Anyway, today or tommorow the movie has break even it's production budget, so it's now "only" has to fill marketing budget and make some profit.

Boxoffice mojo quotes the production budget as $75 million. There's some contention over whether Boxoffice Mojo production budget quote includes marketing or not. But lets assume for argument's sake that it does. Box Office mojo uses a 55% rule of thumb for revenue from box office to go to the movie studio, but other sources reckon that overseas revenue is less than 50% for the movie studio and in China some people have claimed it's as low as 25% of revenuye goes to the movie studio. I've stayed a little optimistic an guessed at 50% box office returning to the studio. So that means the movie needs to gross $150 million world wide for the studio to break even. Don't start counting any chickens until the $150 million egg has hatched. If the movie doesn't gross $150 million worldwide then its a flop as far as the studio is concerned.

It was a good but flawed movie, and I can see why it hasn't clicked with audiences. It has been sandwiched between Mission Impossible and James Bond, without a genuine headline actor to attract the crowds to an unfamiliar franchise, or rather a franchise that's fallen out of the public consciousness.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

On the plus side it cost less to make than fantastic 4.



Check the link below. (note to Admins: it's not really porn please don't ban me!)

 

good film but got sandwhiched by the idea of spectre and mi5 , very fun but poor marketing and straight outta comptonbeing bigger than anyone anticipated
if it had opened this last friday it would have done much better



Around the Network
Barozi said:
The movie was excellent.
While it has a spy theme, the movie is much closer to a comedy than a serious action flick and thus not really comparable to any of the James Bond movies.

you sure about this? bond was in fuckn space!!!!



Well, the movie starts well but ended being kinda rubbish so I'm not surprised.



The Fury said:
Mordred11 said:

Movies follow pre-established accurate patterns after their 1st weekend + 1st monday, depending on their performance. You don't have to wait 2 months to say for sure that a movie is a success or a failure.

Word of mouth can help, you know?

 

I'm going to bookmark this thread and in 2 months... 

 

:P

Where is your god, now?



d21lewis said:

Where is your god, now?

It's been 3 weeks since I posted that, hardly 2 months.

And... you, you are my god.



Hmm, pie.

The Fury said:
d21lewis said:

Where is your god, now?

It's been 3 weeks since I posted that, hardly 2 months.

And... you, you are my god.


Oh, you! 

*giggles*