By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sports Discussion - The NFL Thread 2015: Denver Broncos win Super Bowl 50

 

Who will win Super Bowl 50?

Patriots 116 25.00%
 
Seahawks 41 8.84%
 
Colts 7 1.51%
 
Packers 42 9.05%
 
Broncos 85 18.32%
 
Ravens 8 1.72%
 
Cowboys 18 3.88%
 
Panthers 56 12.07%
 
Other 74 15.95%
 
Scoreboard 17 3.66%
 
Total:464

Not only did he write one of the dumbest articles even but he also posted another stupid thing a little over a year ago.

 

The following was posted by Jim 1 year ago almost exactly.

"Jim Folsom posted 362 days agoJim Folsom
OK it's time to call it. I was right all along. The guy was not worthy of a number one pick. Never was. Never will be. He's lost his mobility. Without that he is mediocre at best. He will not ever be a stand-in-the-pocket passer, which is what I said all along. Four years into your career, a #1 draft pick QB should have his team a Super Bowl contender. Anyone think Carolina is a Super Bowl contender? Hell no. And they never will be with sCam at QB. So all you morons who texted death threats to my phone, or posted crap on here wanting to admit I am wrong when clearly I never was because you were butthurt that not everyone believes everything your local Charlotte media pumps up their butts (or tries to) can...as they used to say on the TV show Psych...SUCK IT! 9 sacks?? Two Pick 6s in one game?? LMFAO!!!

And by the way, I will not be showing up to any games in sCam jersey in 2016. I am not going to be held responsible after last night for the Panther's coaching staff being too stupid to bench this bust. I'd bench him next week. What is he 2-6-1? His back up is 1-0. Time for him to start.

P.S.- The over/under on Anderson taking over as starting QB? I give it four weeks."

Well the good thing about him writing that article is that it looks like he no longer has a job at the bleacher report.  But the bleacher report really isn't a good sports site they also gave the Seatle Seahawks a F for their 2012 draft.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1165320-2012-nfl-draft-grades-power-ranking-teams-that-failed-on-draft-day



Around the Network
Chris Hu said:

Not only did he write one of the dumbest articles even but he also posted another stupid thing a little over a year ago.

 

The following was posted by Jim 1 year ago almost exactly.

"Jim Folsom posted 362 days agoJim Folsom
OK it's time to call it. I was right all along. The guy was not worthy of a number one pick. Never was. Never will be. He's lost his mobility. Without that he is mediocre at best. He will not ever be a stand-in-the-pocket passer, which is what I said all along. Four years into your career, a #1 draft pick QB should have his team a Super Bowl contender. Anyone think Carolina is a Super Bowl contender? Hell no. And they never will be with sCam at QB. So all you morons who texted death threats to my phone, or posted crap on here wanting to admit I am wrong when clearly I never was because you were butthurt that not everyone believes everything your local Charlotte media pumps up their butts (or tries to) can...as they used to say on the TV show Psych...SUCK IT! 9 sacks?? Two Pick 6s in one game?? LMFAO!!!

And by the way, I will not be showing up to any games in sCam jersey in 2016. I am not going to be held responsible after last night for the Panther's coaching staff being too stupid to bench this bust. I'd bench him next week. What is he 2-6-1? His back up is 1-0. Time for him to start.

P.S.- The over/under on Anderson taking over as starting QB? I give it four weeks."

Well the good thing about him writing that article is that it looks like he no longer has a job at the bleacher report.  But the bleacher report really isn't a good sports site they also gave the Seatle Seahawks a F for their 2012 draft.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1165320-2012-nfl-draft-grades-power-ranking-teams-that-failed-on-draft-day

Is that for real?  Holy cats.  That's not just bad, that's childish.  That's dedicated sports forum level.

Newton must have cut him off in traffic or something because that sounds personal.  Not something someone who should be reasonably impartial should be writing.  That he ever held the title of "analyst" is kind of sad.

Also, the line about how a no. 1 pick at QB should automatically turn his team into a Superbowl contender is just stupid.  It's a team game.





ljigga said:
SD-OAK  2 WAS-PHI 2 SF-DET 2 PIT-BAL 1
DAL-BUF 2 CHI-TB 2 CAR-ATL 1 IND-MIA 2
NE-NYJ 1 HOU-TEN 1 CLE-KC 2 JAC-NO 2
GB-ARI 2 STL-SEA 2 NYG-MIN 2 CIN-DEN 2 by 7

 





I have lived as a warrior. I have died as a god. Having suffered the ultimate sacrifice, I have been denied release. I...I will defeat Olympus. I will have my revenge

--Kratos

Nope the guy is just a big time University of Flordia homer and I guess he is still pissed that Cam left there and went to Auburn.



Redskins please.



                            

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
SD-OAK 2 WAS-PHI 1
SF-DET 2 PIT-BAL 1
DAL-BUF 2 CHI-TB 2 CAR-ATL 1 IND-MIA 2
NE-NYJ 1 HOU-TEN 1 CLE-KC 2 JAC-NO 2
GB-ARI 2 STL-SEA 2 NYG-MIN 2 CIN-DEN 2 x 10

 





Give me Skins tonight please.



MTZehvor said:
RolStoppable said:
SD-OAK 2 WAS-PHI 1 SF-DET 2 PIT-BAL 1
DAL-BUF 2 CHI-TB 2 CAR-ATL 1 IND-MIA 2
NE-NYJ 2 HOU-TEN 1 CLE-KC 2 JAC-NO 2
GB-ARI 2 STL-SEA 2 NYG-MIN 2 CIN-DEN 2 by 10

 

Changing from NE to NYJ. With Devin McCourty, Danny Amendola, and Patrick Chung all being ruled out earlier today, I don't think the Pats have the pieces to put up more than 20 points on the Jets or keep them below 20.



RolStoppable said:
Not looking good for Arkaign's deluded prediction.





Holy crap, the NFC East is such a joke.