The PC ports were released during the PS1 generation making them current gen, but I didn't remember if they were late ports. My bad. Should had googled it before posting.

The current console doesn't matter, because this is a disscussion about the posibility of a NX version. There is a lot of assumptions that come with that since we don't know what the NX really is.

No one is questioning Final Fantasy history with PlayStation. I was simply pointing out it's history with Nintendo even if its ancient. That Nintendo systems had, historically, one more exclusive numbered offline Final Fantasy during the respective generations of their original platforms its not my fault, but simple fact.

Your argument, has been to undermine the NX posibilities of having XV by simply pointing out that the FF relationship with PlayStation platforms is more current. Which is silly since Final Fantasy hasn't been a Sony exclusive franshise since XII came out almost 10 years ago. You see, the problem with your argument is that Final Fantasy's history with Sony is inconsecuential because we are discussing If XV should come to the NX, not if it will come to PlayStation 4. The only relationship that matters here is that of Squenix and Nintendo. The "PlayStation relationship" is not stopping XV from comming to Xbone. Why would it stop it from comming to NX? Nintendo not paying the Final Fantasy tax, on the other hand, is a much better reason for thinking it wouldn't happen.

Six were Nintendo exclusives, but the last one was in 1994...? That's my point. If the Wii U was as powerful as the PS4 and One, we'd probably see FFXV there. But I doubt the costs of porting the game to the NX (assuming it can handle it) would be worth it.

KH3 would sell well on a Nintendo console. Hope they consider it.

You sure know little about a franchise you seem to love...

Thats asuming the NX has a different architecture to the PS4 and One? Because every rumor seems to points out to an all AMD architecture.

But yep, the last Nintendo exclusive numbered Final Fantasy came out around 21 years ago which is ancient. If your point is that the time that has passed makes it irrellevant know that the last offline main entry Final Fantasy was XIII 5 years ago which is still a long time. XII was 9 years ago and X was 14 years ago. My point being that the recent history of Final Fantasy isn't really that recent. But all that is irrellevant because having a history (even if ancient) with Nintendo is more that can be said about the PS1 and 360 yet they still got VII and XIII respectively with no prior FF history. Square had to test the waters with those 2 entries. In other words, history is not as important. Money and marketshare triumph. They just have to retest the waters with a Nintendo console. Until they do that, no one knows how is going to perform.

I think is going to do great because afaik the Zelda fanbase seems to like Final Fantasy too and Bravely Default is very popular among Nintendo fans. Also, many Zeldo fans seem interested in a more realistic, mature, open world take on Zelda which FFXV might deliver.

I'll give Final Fantasy XV a 5% chance of getting an NX port, but I'll give Kingdom Hearts 3 a 20% chance of getting an NX port. Since there are so many uncertainties pertaining to the NX, running through all potential scenarios in my head lead to these odd percentages.

I may start to believe this once it's confirmed that NX is a home console and not a handheld. For all we know, it could be the 3DS version ported to NX.

of those 6 nintendo FF games, 3 didn't come to the west until much later, II,III,V though IV was called II and VI was called III. at least one was only exclusive to nintendo for 6 months ff. several made their first appearance in the west on playstation consoles II, V.

Doesn't change what he said.

If they arrive on the NX and sell well, I'd not be at all surprised to see the FFVII remake follow them over.