By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - 2015: PS4: 87 Games, XboxOne: 22 Games ?

So what OP trying to say is that Xbox One games is all about the past and PS4 is all about the present, the future, and the past and the thing out side of our imagination. It seems legit.



Around the Network

It's funny that xb1 is proclaimed to have a better library this year as a fact. 2 of their games are shooters (one of which is a remaster), and one is an annual racing game, and the last is a timed exclusive that will come to ps4 within 12 months of the xb1 release. Sounds pretty subjective to me.

Halo and gears are both crap imo. I didn't even buy either franchise on my 360, as playing my roommates copies was torture enough. All the rpgs + gow3 + tearaway + uncharted collection is a better line up. Oh wait.... opinion and tastes are subjective in referece to each individual. Damn all those xbox fans made me think opinion was fact.

 

Seriously though.  Halo can fornicate itself. Gears was was just okay.



Funny how some people disregard japanese games and indies and then praise Ori, Scalebound and Recore...



Azzanation said:

I am a PC gamer and i have 4000+ games to buy on Steam compared to my XB1 and PS4 which has nothing compared, i dont start writing articles claiming PC is better because i have a huge amount of games to choose from. Sorry my opinion is i would play those Blockbusters over mediocre to average games on Steam, Live or PSN because thats why i brought a console, to play AAA franchises. Sure its ok to have varity but varity isnt always better as a Blockbuster game is something gamers want to play, not just choose to play them because they have no other choice. I own 800+ games on my Steam account (Look me up Azzanation) and i can tell you i only play the AAAs even though my library of games offers me more doesnt mean i use them. Halo 5 counters nearly half my Steam library of games i own because thats a big AAA that i would spend 100+ hours on. Not OiiOii2 which i would spend 5mins on.

Maybe im old school but 1 good game is better then 5 average games. I owned both N64 and PS1 and my PS1 never got used because the N64 library was gold, i have over 20+ great AAA games iv spent 1000s of hours on compared to my PS1 where i mainly brought 3rd party titles like FF7 and the PS1 had tons more games to choose from. Qauntity isnt always the anwser to my gaming experinces. I just want good experinces.

@bold:  No, you feel like you are entitled to say what every gamer wants based off of your own opinion.  News flash!  Not everyone wants to play Halo 5, Gears 4, and Forza 6.  You may see these as blockbuster titles, while others see them as boring and repetitive franchises.  When I look at a game, I always ask the same question:  What gaming experience does this game provide that other iterations have not done in the past?  What new experience is Halo 5 bringing to shooters that no other shooter has done before?  

The moment that any gamer says something bad about Halo is the moment they get blasted.  God forbid that I have never bought and really played any of the Halo games.  God forbid that I sit here and say that I have no interest in playing those titles.  You may spend 100+ hours on Halo 5, while I would spend a couple of hours playing it and move on.  This is what you sound like:  Oh the PS4 has tons of JRPGS where I can play 1000 hours on a single game while I will only play 100 hours on Halo 5.  I would rather buy one quality game (JRPG) than play 10 low quality games like a Halo 5.

The whole point in saying that was to not put down Halo.  I had to do that because apparently that is the only way to talk to you.  I try to speak to you with neutrality and with an open mind; however, you come back with negativity and downplaying.  

Answer this one question for me:  If you have fun with a game, would you consider that to be a quality game?

You see what I did there?  I stripped away the name of the game and the budget of the game.  But deep down, you don't want to admit that, yes, if I have fun with a game, then it is a quality game.  Keep thinking that the PS4 is selling based off of hype.  I will sit here and tell you that the PS4 is selling because they have a diverse lineup of quality games that appeal to a vast array of gamers who have varying tastes.  

@underline:  Huh?  "Varity" provides diversity.  So why would you be forced to play a game because you have no other choice?  "Varity" provides tons of choices....

Btw, it is variety, not varity. Quantity, not qauntity. Bought, not brought.  Those are not typos, as you have made the same mistakes despite the fact that I pointed it out in previous posts -_-



Since launch PS4 library have twice the releases of Xbone... not surprised that 2015 is even bigger the difference when MS almost give up on releases all the year except for 3 game on holidays.



Around the Network

Am I missing something? Why is Halo 5 not on the list?



0331 Happiness is a belt-fed weapon

DialgaMarine said:
Am I missing something? Why is Halo 5 not on the list?

It is.



GribbleGrunger said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

Oh, so you proved somehow opinions on games are "a lie"? lol no offense but what a load of crap.

It's not an opinion, it's a fact. A fact that has been catagorically proven time and time again in as many ways as possible.

It is an opinion. You're taking it as some sort of literal accusation that the PS4 factually has zero games available, which is just a stupid thing for someone to say. What people are saying when they say "PS4 has no games" is that the platform has no games that appeal to them. And sorry to burst your bubble, but that's not a "lie", nor is it something you can prove to be wrong. People will like what they like, regardless of whether you agree or not.

These games can appeal to many people. To many others they might not. We saw it last gen with the Wii. We also saw it last gen with the 360. It's funny how on this site by the very same people upset about "PS4 has no games!" we saw a lot of stuff about how "360 has no games!" when a lot of its stuff was smaller downloadable titles and indies for portions of various years. I mean, the logic made sense back then, why does it suddenly have to be a "lie"?



LudicrousSpeed said:

It is an opinion. You're taking it as some sort of literal accusation that the PS4 factually has zero games available, which is just a stupid thing for someone to say. What people are saying when they say "PS4 has no games" is that the platform has no games that appeal to them. And sorry to burst your bubble, but that's not a "lie", nor is it something you can prove to be wrong. People will like what they like, regardless of whether you agree or not.

These games can appeal to many people. To many others they might not. We saw it last gen with the Wii. We also saw it last gen with the 360. It's funny how on this site by the very same people upset about "PS4 has no games!" we saw a lot of stuff about how "360 has no games!" when a lot of its stuff was smaller downloadable titles and indies for portions of various years. I mean, the logic made sense back then, why does it suddenly have to be a "lie"?

Yeah, course I do fella LOL

Facts are facts. The PS4 has more Indies, more FTP, more AAA, higher scoring games on average and a far more diverse library. It absolutely does not matter if your console of choice has less as long as you're happy with the choice it has. This isn't about who has the most games, it's about proving the XB1 gamers wrong when they were saying it has no games. BECAUSE it was the XB1 gamers saying this it was only innevitable that the conversation would move to a postion of 'you have no right to say that', which is did ... and here we are. XB1 gamers need to stop lying about the PS4 library and enjoy their own library. If they dont' then they're going to be made to look foolish over and over again.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


GribbleGrunger said:

"The PS4 has released in more countries. The XB1 will catch up when it releases in more countries."
"It won't make a difference. The PS4 has better hardware, better games, more games and superior multiplats."
"It will! Watch and see."

*Releases in more countries ... silence for a while.*

"It's the price I tell you! That's why the PS4 is selling more. Wait until the XB1 is cheaper ... you'll see."
"It's not the price, it's the better hardware, better games, more games and superior multiplats."

*Price cut ... silence for a while*

"The PS4 has less games than the XB1. Why is it selling more?"
"Actually it has a lot more."
"No, Indies don't count."
"It has more even without Indies."
"FTP don't count."
"It has more even without FTP."
"Remasters don't count."
"It has more even without remasters."

*Silence for a while*

"But the XB1 games are rated much higher ... that's what counts."
"Actually, the PS4 games are rated higher."

*Silence for a while*

"Why is the PS4 selling better? I don't understand it. It must be hype."


You should add BC somewhere in there :D



“Ore no... Kachi da!”