On the contrary for me, speaking Spanish broke the magic a little. :P Fortunately I can't understand half the shit he's saying lol

Hard to blame PC for a clear developer issue, but does raises some questions and precedents that can feed some future arguments but...

...I feel this thread is for the lolz so won't enter into any of that, carry on.

I just peed! LOL

What settings are those for PC? I'm actually getting this game for free with my GPU on my monster rig that I built/bought today, will have to test it and perhaps upload some screenies.

They really should have separate reviews for the PC port of Arkham Knight so that it can be properly averaged into their overall metacritic score... based on what I'm reading they'd get a failing grade with the PC.

No excuse for that kind of nonsense.

Mummelmann said: What settings are those for PC? I'm actually getting this game for free with my GPU on my monster rig that I built/bought today, will have to test it and perhaps upload some screenies.

its max settings i think 

Shame the game is another WB hackjob... Challenge rooms, the main source of replay value in previous entries, stripped out for either later paid dlc or just not released at all. Instead "you better play those batmobile challenges and you better enjoy them cause we worked so hard on it". Might I add the words challenge rooms were used in promoting the game, misleading consumers.
They are possibly worse than Ubi and EA at this point

WB games and AAA on PC. Their outsourcing strategy doesn't seem to work except for the Lego games that have the same developer since the beginning I think

Lol, still doesn't top The Order 1886 interview though.

$399, not $1399

some publishers dont take pc platform seriously for whatever reason.