Well...yeah.  How is one meant to be "objective" about what games they are excited about?  People have different tastes and these companies often appeal to those market's bias.

Even though FFVII is timed exclusive, the damage is done. And it is most likely PS4/PC only anyways just like the original, and it'll sell more on PS4 too.

Yet Uncharted 4 is seemingly a big part of Sonys conference, which we allready knew about.

Sure MS did the trifecta Halo, Gears, Forza. But we got two new IPs, a 30 game for $30 Rare collection, and did what we all thought wasn't going to happen: backwards compatibility.

The biggest points from Sony IMO are a TIMED exclusive FF7 remake, and repackaged a 2009 announcement for 2015 with The Last Guardian. They merely confirmed the game still exists, while leaving the rest of 2015 in the hands of 3rd party deals. Please help me understand why Sony won over MS.

^^ pretty much this. Just because there are a number of games coming out, doesnt mean they appeal to people more than something more exciting further along.

• Halo - Big if you like Halo.. but reveal wasnt that impressive - was outshone by Doom and SW Battlefront
• Gears of war remake - great if you like gears - (we care about remakes even if we slate the competition for making remakes)
• Forza 6 - another forza, great if you purchased the others, but not exciting if you dont
• Tomb Raider - The game I am most interested in... shame the reveal was quite boring..they didnt show it off that well. (note its a timed release)
• Fable - really looks poor - Just evolve in a different skin
• New Rare Game - Assassins Creed but with worse graphics and presentation was lacklustre - online game (gah).
• Backwards compatibility - that ended up being their biggest announcement, and I think that says it all. Great if you want to play lots of old games (I certainly do), but surely if they are criticising companies for making remasters, all they have done is give access to old content... to me that's where they have falled down.
• Recore - interesting trailer but just CGI
• Day Z guy - a game that's not a game - no gameplay
• Hololens - fake presentation on a product with no release date and no cost, and according to people it's focus isnt for console anyway 

Those are games that +thousands of fans been begging for, for nearly a decade. Sony delivered, and captured the gamers spirits.

At least, from all the forums I checked out, the consensus is that Sony had a better conference then MS. Usually the PS4 guys are all about ripping apart MS's focus on COD, Kinect, or PR missteps, but this E3 is more quiet in that department. They are just focusing on what Sony did to win, and not basing that win on MS missteps.....because MS actually did a great show. On a internet that is seemingly dominated by PS4 fans, I'll take that as a win from the Xbox camp :)

This is not a discussion about which console has more games releasing in 2015. That was already stablished with previous threads showing that PS4 was going to get around 4 times more games this year than XB1.

This is a discussion about who won E3.

E3 is not to beg people to buy your console in the holidays, its about the feeling of gaming. Its about surprises and new games. Sony delivered.

Microsoft for what they are did a fine job.  They just don't make games for me.  I don't care about Halo, Gears or Forza at all. I don't fault them for making them, but I also cannot say three games I'll never play help their cause with me.

For me Sony made a wish list and nailed three big ones in one show I had given up on.  They truly did something special there that likely won't happen for another decade. 

But E3 isn't just about what happens in the next month. That excuse to downplay any conference is laughable at best to me.

And you calling out the bias is doubly laughable, to put it gently. We all know who you are here.

Here, I will add to the Sony part your wrote, which your bias made sure to leave a lot out:

The Last Guardian, Horizon: Zero Dawn, Final Fantasy VII Remake, Dreams, Firewatch, World of Final Fantasy, Shenmue 3, No Man's Sky, Morpheus and RIGS, Uncharted 4.

While MS had a very good show this year, no reasonable gamer is saying otherwise, the magnitude simply wasn't of the scale of Sony's. Sure enough, Sony has Square-Enix to thank for part of that. But Sony is responsible for Shenmue 3, since they've confirmed they've been in talk with Yu Suzuki to bring it back and now it's happening. While most of those games won't come in the close future, Sony did a great job in reassuring people that the PS4 will deliver big time. And besides, a lot of that content is set to come out in early 2016, which isn't that far away. So again, the argument that E3 should only be about the games that release for the holiday of the same year is nonsensical. 

It is not bias for Sony that make me say they won. While they had a strong show with Horizon, The Last Guardian and Uncharted 4, if Final Fantasy VII R and Shenmue 3 had been announced at any other conference, that other conference would have won for me. But since Sony announced those, and since they are responsible for Shenmue 3, there simply isn't any competition in my book. Because I have been waiting for those games to be announced for over a decade. Sony made that happen. So they win this time for me.

But FF7 doesn't belong to them....no more then Tomb Raider belongs to XBox fans. Still find it difficult to believe that Sony saying The Last Guardian still exists counts as a megaton.

But hey, if that's what you guys want, then more power to ya. But in all that glamour, they kinda left the rest of this year in the hands of third parties, while MS has a stacked lineup and is bringing backwards compatibility.

Guess what I'm trying to say is that MS used to be criticized for leaving some years barren only to focus on the next one, as well as relying on third parties. MS is announcing 2016+ things, but also giving us things in the near future. Sony is banking on the idea of what the future will bring, while taking it easy now just because they are the market leader. Just my persepctive, but ok I see your points.