So what are you? | |||
| A freedom-hating Commie. | 7 | 21.88% | |
| A fascist pig. | 3 | 9.38% | |
| A treehugger. | 12 | 37.50% | |
| (offensive Q4 joke) | 10 | 31.25% | |
| Total: | 32 | ||
Appearantly, I'm a freedom-loving commie ^^
Yeah this is pretty much as it has always been with me. My super left parents and super right aunts/uncles fight me all the time over it.
Im a social libertarian, deal with it bitches.
A warrior keeps death on the mind from the moment of their first breath to the moment of their last.
  |
  |
| amp316 said: I'm not to far from Ghandi. Ghandi with a gun... |
Gundie?
@topic)
mine, probably normal for europeans
The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them.
Ernest Hemmingway
| huiii said: Close enough. I'd probably put myself a bit more to the right in terms of the economic scale. |
Heh, I'm just over the border.
Some of the questions were pretty ambigous though.
"Just for comparison Uncharted 4 was 20x bigger than Splatoon 2. This shows the huge difference between Sony's first-party games and Nintendo's first-party games."
I can't take this quiz (anymore), primarily because I feel like some of the questions are loaded with the quiz's viewpoint and if I answer honestly, would mean something different from the quizmakers' intentions.
For example, the very first question:
"If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."
I'm going out on a limb and saying that voting agree on this moves you left, while voting disagree will move you right. However, what if, like me, you believe that interests of trans-national corporations are the interests of humanity, with nuance (so long as it's done by free trade).
I support global free trade, but I do not support the EU, NAFTA, TPA, or any of that lot. This question would assume that I do support those things.
| SamuelRSmith said: I can't take this quiz (anymore), primarily because I feel like some of the questions are loaded with the quiz's viewpoint and if I answer honestly, would mean something different from the quizmakers' intentions. For example, the very first question: "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations." I'm going out on a limb and saying that voting agree on this moves you left, while voting disagree will move you right. However, what if, like me, you believe that interests of trans-national corporations are the interests of humanity, with nuance (so long as it's done by free trade). I support global free trade, but I do not support the EU, NAFTA, TPA, or any of that lot. This question would assume that I do support those things. |
That seemed like a loaded question in my opinion. Some of the others seems like that too.
Why can't the interests of trans-national corporations primairly serve humanity or sustain people's quality of life?
It's making it seem like it's a "either or" situation when one is being worded to look bad to fix the outcome.
Kinda like...
Would you rather be rich and a morally bad person but lonely?
or
Would you rather be a good but poor person who is liked by most?
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
