Quantcast
Why is Nintendo winning the handheld war?

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why is Nintendo winning the handheld war?

?

Marketing 16 4.89%
 
Ultra marvelous fantastic games 175 53.52%
 
Sony need to do a better job 47 14.37%
 
Cultists fans 26 7.95%
 
More mainstream 21 6.42%
 
Cheaper development, more profit 25 7.65%
 
Unique hardware features 17 5.20%
 
Total:327

One word: Pokemon. And Mario and Monster Hunter and Zelda and Yo-Kai Watch and Dragon Quest and Animal Crossing.



Official Tokyo Mirage Sessions #FE Thread

                                      

Around the Network
shenlong213 said:
daredevil.shark said:
War? Do they have competition? Nope. They are king in this regard. PSP did resistance and wasn't good enough.


How about Vita ? A handheld with better hardware, more interesting app & features


Come on, the original gameboy ran on three shades of puke green and beat a handheld with full color.  Of course the gamegear also ran through batteries like some sort of analogy of a thing/person that goes through a bunch of stuff really quick that I'm too tired to come up with, but still.



Blob said:
Pokemon. Take that away and I honestly believe handhelds would collapse. They had no competition during the early years but pokemon has kept them alive.

Nintendo 3DS software = 188.01 m

All 3DS Pokemon titles combined = 21 m (approx)

Mario Kart 7 (10.69 m) and Super Mario 3D Land (10.12) by themselves offset that.  There is no denying that Pokemon always gives the hardware a nice boost.  But I think to say that Nintendo's entire handheld division would collapse without it is an exaggeration to say the least.  Mario (Kart, 3D Land, NSMB2, Sticker Star), Animal Crossing, Smash Bros, Luigi's Mansion, Tamodachi Life, Zelda (Ocarina, Link Between Worlds), Monster Hunter (4, 4 Ultimate, Tri), Nintendogs + Cats, and Yokai Watch 2 (Ganso/Honke, Shinuchi) are all multi-million selling heavy hitters in their own rights.  These titles would still push the system in the absence of 1 or 2 big Pokemon releases. 

The best selling game on Vita (#1. Uncharted: Golden Abyss - 1.43m)  doesn't even make the Top 25 on 3DS (# 25. Kingdom Hearts: Dream Drop Distance - 1.45m) by comparison.  So, I think clearly it's all of Nintendo's franchises combined that are what gives Nintendo dominance in the handheld space, rather than singling out just one.



Pokemon is the main key.

One of the reasons why many people buy Nintendo's portables is Pokemon.

There's other franchises/games in the library and the convenience of portability.

Plus it is cheaper than any competition out there (well except for mobile gaming somewhat).



    

Basil's YouTube Channel


                    

Tachikoma said:
shenlong213 said:

 

Just wanna know what do you think

Same reason PlayStations winning the console war.

Strongest brand for its sector.

(And because you don't consider the mobile market handheld gamers)


This. I consider mobile and handheld different markets though. I see no point in downplaying nintendo's success with handhelds. 



Around the Network

Nintendo has the biggest IPs on the handheld market: Mario, Pokemon, Animal Crossing... Along with smaller franchises like Fire Emblem, Brain Training, Tomodachi life, Nintendogs... Most of Nintendo's franchise work really well on handhelds.

That combined with third parties bombs like Tetris, Dragon Quest, Monster Hunter, Youkai Watch... basically has allowed Nintendo to run unopposed on that market.

Even the big PSP couldn't harm Nintendo in that regard. Mobile has reduced the handheld market, not the influence Nintendo has over it.



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

Because it's hard to lose when there's no competition.



Aeolus451 said:
Tachikoma said:

Same reason PlayStations winning the console war.

Strongest brand for its sector.

(And because you don't consider the mobile market handheld gamers)


This. I consider mobile and handheld different markets though. I see no point in downplaying nintendo's success with handhelds. 


Same here, comparing handhelds to mobile is like comparing computers to consoles.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

Aeolus451 said:
Tachikoma said:

Same reason PlayStations winning the console war.

Strongest brand for its sector.

(And because you don't consider the mobile market handheld gamers)


This. I consider mobile and handheld different markets though. I see no point in downplaying nintendo's success with handhelds. 

I agree 1,000x over.  Every single sale of a 3DS represents the sale of a dedicated gaming device.  Every sale of an iphone (or insert brand phone here) does not.  I know people who play Candy Crush and Clash of Clans on their phones.  They never owned a DS or PSP, and therefore aren't denying potential sales from 3DS or Vita by playing games on their mobile devices.  I think that's the case for a pretty large # of people in the mobile market.



Because the competition shoot itself and...

Because Nintendo is the stronger brand on handhelds, it has more games, bettter third party support, bigger library, lower price, better first party support, etc.

And Pokemon, ever since Pokemon it's faded to win all gens, Pokemon is a phenomenum, an ace.