There's no fun in playing Ori in Normal difficulty or less. The controls are super tight...
| shikamaru317 said: Never cared for Gears xD Gears 4 is the first one that has interested me, thanks to the new characters and more colorful art design, but I haven't gotten a chance to play it. Come to think of it, I didn't 100% complete Ori. I have 1000 GS on it so I thought I did, but that 1000GS includes Definitive Edition achievements, I don't have 100% on the main game. |
I never cared for Halo before this gen and now I consider myself a fan :P Go ahead and give Gears a chance! I also noticed you didn't play Metro Last Light. I understand you like story-driven games so you should try Metro 2033 and Last Light, they're amazing.
shikamaru317 said:
It saddens me that so few people gave Infinite Warfare's singleplayer a chance, just because they were biased against the game due to it's futuristic setting. It's actually the best CoD campaign since MW2 way back in 2009. |
Isn't the MP futuristic as well?
After all it only counts people who have given the game a chance. If the game has been played by 10k people or 10m doesn't change that. 5.37% is 5.37%.
btw. I started Her Majesty's SPIFFING from the sale and it's a really funny and not too complex adventure game.
If you like the Sam & Max Telltale games for example, you will enjoy this too. Just a warning though, it's a bit short.
| Barozi said: More boredom at work, so I put the lists together and added some more. |
Shamelessly quoting myself.
F= Finished campaign
U= Unfinished
N= Not Started/Owned
shikamaru317 said:
I'm guessing most people bought it for the zombies mode, which isn't futuristic, not the SP or MP. I've heard that the multiplayer is practically a ghost town already, and clearly the singleplayer didn't do well either based on that completion percentage. |
lol I own the game and didn't even know it had a zombie mode (though if you remember my game is in Spanish, so I probably didn't notice on the main menu).
I was under the impression that Zombies was Treyarch exclusive.
shikamaru317 said:
They've been releasing Zombies on everything since 2014 I believe. Advanced Warfare, Black Ops 3, and Infinite Warfare all have zombies. Not sure if CoD WW2 does though, it might have dropped the zombies. |
Zombies already confirmed for WW2
derpysquirtle64 said:
Xbox had diverse games lineup back in Xbox and early 360 days. But because shooter games turned out to be way more popular on Xbox and MS earned a lot of money from them, they've decided not to continue investing in games other than the most popular franchises. |
That is not true at all! The second half of Xbox 360 life was focused on Kinect and wether we like it or not, Kinect games are not shooters. Developing for Kinect had to effect other games and please don't tell me they should've spent $100 million on Lost Odyessy 2 instead of Halo 4 or Gears 3.
How was Xbox One first 3 years "shooters focused"? What shooters did they invest on other than one Halo and one Gears game? The only one I can think of is TitanFall. While they invesred on, on top of my head:
Ryse
Sunset Overdrive
Max
Kinect Sports
Quantum Break
Ori
Tomb Raider
Fable Legend
Forza Motorsport
Forza Horizon
Those are just games on top of my head. For the next 12 months we don't even have a shooter. Crackdown, Sea of thieves, State of Decay, Lucky Tales, Cuphead, Ashen and Ori.
It is the same with the talk about Microsoft and new ip's. They invested on the same number Sony and Nintendo invested on, but unfortunately, other than Ori, none had commercial success.
Right now, Microsoft problem is not the diversity of their games. It is the lack of investing on games in general and thats started with Phil era. He justified it by focusing on fixing the hardware first and now he's moving to software. I think it is two options, either he's saying the truth or Microsoft cut down the Xbox budget with the new CEO. Next E3 will tell us the truth.
I LOVE GIGGS said:
That is not true at all! The second half of Xbox 360 life was focused on Kinect and wether we like it or not, Kinect games are not shooters. Developing for Kinect had to effect other games and please don't tell me they should've spent $100 million on Lost Odyessy 2 instead of Halo 4 or Gears 3.
How was Xbox One first 3 years "shooters focused"? What shooters did they invest on other than one Halo and one Gears game? The only one I can think of is TitanFall. While they invesred on, on top of my head:
Ryse Sunset Overdrive Max Kinect Sports Quantum Break Ori Tomb Raider Fable Legend Forza Motorsport Forza Horizon
Those are just games on top of my head. For the next 12 months we don't even have a shooter. Crackdown, Sea of thieves, State of Decay, Lucky Tales, Cuphead, Ashen and Ori.
It is the same with the talk about Microsoft and new ip's. They invested on the same number Sony and Nintendo invested on, but unfortunately, other than Ori, none had commercial success.
Right now, Microsoft problem is not the diversity of their games. It is the lack of investing on games in general and thats started with Phil era. He justified it by focusing on fixing the hardware first and now he's moving to software. I think it is two options, either he's saying the truth or Microsoft cut down the Xbox budget with the new CEO. Next E3 will tell us the truth. |
What I mean is that it is obvious that MS rely on shooter games and Halo, Gears, Forza trinity more than everything else. This games that you listed didn't sell really well because unfortunately the community of Xbox doesn't care about this games a lot. We won't see sequels for the majority of this titles because they sold not good enough for MS to get a sequel. But I kinda agree that early years of Xbox One had fantastic first-party. And if some games wouldn't have been cancelled (Fable Legends, Phantom Dust, Scalebound), it should have been even better. Xbox One in terms of games in my opinion was better than PS4 up until 2016 when we finally started to see results of Phil Spencer's work. And now I don't think that future of Xbox looks bright to be honest. It seems that they rely on third-party too much and just want to make Xbox the best place to play multiplat games without investing in first-party. Also the guys at Xbox management are definitely fans of shitty Steam early access and multiplayer titles and they try to push it on their console. They doesn't look like the people who understands console market because they are PC gamers. So I wouldn't bet that E3 2018 will bring some new exciting single player IPs which will attract a lot of new people to the platform.
shikamaru317 said:
It saddens me that so few people gave Infinite Warfare's singleplayer a chance, just because they were biased against the game due to it's futuristic setting. It's actually the best CoD campaign since MW2 way back in 2009. |
Yes, it was good I can say and way better than Black Ops 3 which was a total mess. But the problem with it is that it was very short. The side missions didn't add much to the main story so it was like 3-4 hours in total and ended very fast.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
