By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Exclusives 2015: Xbox One vs PlayStation 4. The complete list

TheLastStarFighter said:
FYI, there is no such thing as second party. You are either first or third. Some people call third parties making exclusive content or wholey owned external studios second party, but it's an erroneous term.

I'm now going to play a second person shooter.

Well, you will get your chance: 

http://www.vg247.com/2015/04/17/second-person-shooter-screencheat-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one/



Around the Network
Puppyroach said:
Ninsect said:
Puppyroach said:
So instead of focusing on releases for PS4 you chose to make it a competition with X1? Playing the victim card for PS4 pretty hard I see :).

What does that mean?

People keep saying PS4 is dominating due to hype and not because it deserves it. Well, here you have a list of games where PS4 utterly dominates, so in the future people can just look at this list before claiming PS4 doesn't deserve the sales.

I don't like the downplaying on either side but the number of releases a console has does not equate quality. This was true with XBLA and it is true with a lot of releases today. Btw, PS4 is dominating sales, it is only logical that it will be more heavily watched and criticized.

Sure, let's equate XBLA with PS4's list. Lol. Come on, you can do better than that.



The One and Only

VizionEck.com

You should probably add a retail-only section (not including limited runs). It can help reduce the amount of drama threads like these often generate ^^



Chazore said:
Hynad said:
Puppyroach said:
So instead of focusing on releases for PS4 you chose to make it a competition with X1? Playing the victim card for PS4 pretty hard I see :).


This thread is just a response to the constant downplay the PS4 gets left and right by [mostly] the XBox crowd. This wouldn't need to exist if those people would just enjoy their favourite console without feeling the need to crap on the competiton just for kicks. 

Oh it's not like Xbox ever gets downplayed on here, especially Nintendo, no sir not at all.

Also look who's talking, you're allowing if not supporting that which you advised against near the end of your sentence.


Only pointing out that the thread is a response to the PS4 downplay going on right now doesn't remotely imply that such things don't also happen to the other two consoles. This thread isn't a response to the downplay that happens for the WIi U, so there's no point in bringing that up here. Any downplay of console makers and exclusive games going on on these forums is annoying and should leave the site to go find solace in the youtube or IGN comment sections. 

As for your last sentence, you see what you want. 



true_fan said:
Hynad said:
Azerth said:
Yeah but wat does the ps4 have for thr holiday. Which is wat the recent "sony has no games" thing is for

Why should we only care about the holiday period? Isn't the rest of the year just as important? Or do you think gamers only play during the holiday period?

Well you have to stop changing the rules to fit your argument, if we are talking big games only then sony will have release 1 good (Bloodbourne) and 1 bad (The Order) for the entire year. MSFT will have had 3, Halo 5, ROTR, and Forza 6.

Uhm. Until Dawn, Tearaway: Unfolded say hello.

MS won't have any major retail game released in the first 9 months of the year. What are you playing right now?



The One and Only

VizionEck.com

Around the Network
SWORDF1SH said:
Farsala said:

Ah, He doesnt specify west though. ROTK is set  DEC 2015 Japan.

Yeah sorry for confusion. All release dates are for the US. Japanese releases do not count.


Okay then Psycho Pass and Mystereet for XB1 is not set to release in US as far as I can tell.


Disgaea 5 and Samurai warriors 4-II is set for US though.

 

Should keep these threads consistent XD.



true_fan said:
BMaker11 said:
true_fan said:

To the multiple people who accuse me of being salty, I'm consistent. I didn't care about indies when 360 had thousands and I don't care about them now that sony buys exclusivity to every indie in sight. I bet these same people touting indies now, did not want to do the whole listing of indie games last gen. Sony is a little light on the big games, so lets tout phone games.

All in all, you all dodged my question, when Win 10 launches and there are a ton of indie games, will they still count?

Even without a single console exclusive for PS4 (but still counting the indies for XBOne), the count is still 43 to 27. No matter how you spin it, PS4 has more games than XBOne.

Yes, you are salty.

Included in your 47 is titles like

n++ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwuP7aTRS6U

Wattam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USQrMJpSe1Y

OMG are you guys seriously including the game that is in people's sig as a game. I never knew what it mean until now. (By the way should be illegal on this site)

All in all I am really jealous I will never get to play the titles above.

And the X1 list includes titles like

Fruit Ninja Kinect 2

and

Slice Zombies for Kinect

Excited yet?



The One and Only

VizionEck.com

I see the list wars have claimed some victims. War is Hell.

Also, in fairness to the list warriors, there are a few PS4 games that are definitely not coming in 2015 like Bombshell, Wild and Wattam, a few more that were never given a release date like VizionEck and Deep Down.
I cannot say anything about the XOne side as I don't follow those news.

I wouldn't really include or list any game without a definite release window, as it's just inflating the numbers unnecessarily.



Ka-pi96 said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
FYI, there is no such thing as second party. You are either first or third. Some people call third parties making exclusive content or wholey owned external studios second party, but it's an erroneous term.

I'm now going to play a second person shooter.

It's not an erroneous term. So what if it doesn't have an official usage, it was made by fans to describe things that aren't adequately described by other terms and hence is an apt description.

Oh and for the record, second person shooters do exist. Well at least one anyways, can't remember the name and I think it was pretty bad and flopped, but it does exist.


Just because fans are using a term doesn't make it correctly

correct. A developer is either independent, or it isn't. 



Ka-pi96 said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
FYI, there is no such thing as second party. You are either first or third. Some people call third parties making exclusive content or wholey owned external studios second party, but it's an erroneous term.

I'm now going to play a second person shooter.

It's not an erroneous term. So what if it doesn't have an official usage, it was made by fans to describe things that aren't adequately described by other terms and hence is an apt description.

Oh and for the record, second person shooters do exist. Well at least one anyways, can't remember the name and I think it was pretty bad and flopped, but it does exist.

Yeah, it's not an 'official' term, but there are many situations where i think it's a useful one. I personally like to make a distinction between something like MGS4, a 3rd party IP exclusive, and something like R&C, a Sony owned IP exclusive that happens to be made by a 3rd party.