By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Christianity is Anti-Hatred of People or Groups of People

Oh my, more of this shit. I bet there's a fetish some people have watching atheists and religious people argue Threads like these only end up in flames.



Around the Network
Lafiel said:
well, my personal believe is that Christianity should be focussed around the idea

"love your neighbor as yourself", with "neighbor" meaning every other human being

along with this gem and lots of stories of Jesus sympathizing with the poor, the ill, the outcast, the weak etc there unfortunately also are some repulsive and discriminating rules and stories in the bible


alot of those rules were based on the social context of the time. In that day the best way for your civilization to thrive was to have higher birth rates and better health.

Pork is a very dirty meat, and back then understanding on how to prepare food to eat safely was not understood. Forbid eating pork, and many of the sicknesses and diseases that can because by improperly prepared Pork can be eliminated.

Homosexuality its not good when you are trying to grow the population. In modern days we are looking for ways to slow population growth so it has no negtive impacts on society.

Polygamy is not banned by the Bible, but it is in most of the civilized world. In a day when many men were killed in battle it made sense to ensure every fertile female had a male to procreate with.  In the modern world we see how detrimental it is to the women in that situation and it is outlawed. Again we are not looking for ways to maximize population growth so there is no positive reason to legalize it. Besides with freedom of sex these days people have multiple sexual partners without have to marry each one.

 

 

There are other things that when you read the Bible (particulary the Old Testament) that someone who does not understand the context of the enviroment they were written would find harsh or just wrong by today's social views.



psn- tokila

add me, the more the merrier.

Christianity is not a hateful religion...but extremely passive aggressive in the new testament. Essentially its telling you "I Love you, but you'll get yours if you don't follow me". The new covenant differs from the old testament where god was more blunt and told you straight up that he was a jealous god and this is the crap that will happen if you don't follow me. Christianity can co-exist with other religions because their whole job is to spread the good word (Even though to many who dont believe it is considered an annoyance). Difference between being a passive aggressive religion is the reason why its the worlds most dominant religion is because it was spread through aggression & slavery.



o_O.Q said:
JWeinCom said:
 

 

"well all i can do is tell you to do the research when you do it will show you that initially people worshipped the celestial bodies as gods then with time they came to worship man as god because of his intellect which allows him to dominate nature"

Alright?  I still don't have any idea what this has to do with atheism.  Atheism is not the worship of man.  You can be an atheist and think people suck donkey balls.  Atheism is simply the lack of belief in any deity.

"i'd like to add btw that these people were a lot more intelligent than we give them credit for " 

Smart and knowledgeable are two very different things.  Socrates, if he actually existed, was probably smarter than me.  I however, am far more knowledgeable, because I have the benefit of thousands of years of human learning. 

"lol well i'd strongly disagree with you here but again that's for you to decide"

No, it's not a matter of my opinion or yours.  It's a matter of you being wrong.  Atheism is the lack of belief in a deity.  Nothing more, and nothing less. Opinion on human intellect is irrelevanct to that.  Please have a basic grasp of what you're discussing before you're discussing it.  Saying that atheist's worship man is as wrong as saying that Christians worship Buddha.

 

"the core of hitlers movement was about evolution... it was about perfecting the human race by limiting reproduction to the group of people that he found to be superior - this is where things like eugenics founded by darwin's brother btw sprang out from"

Nope nope.  To claim that the Nazi movement was about evolution would be as fallacious (actually way more) as to say that it was a Christian movement.  Any book supporting Darwin's theory was banned.  There are some references to evolution in MeinKamph, but far more refernences to god are made.  Hitler specifically attributes his hatred of Jews to God, under the belief that the Jews betrayed Jesus.

Also, I fail to see what this has to do with atheism.  Belief or disbelief in evolution has no bearing on whether or not you believe in a god.  The Catholic church officially accepts the theory of evolution, so there is no reason that Hitler could not have been a Catholic and believed in evolution. 

If you're going to make those sorts of claims, you have to have some evidence to support yourself.

the word aryan in the sense with which it was used then was and i paraphase - super man or super human or perfected man etc etc etc and it came straight from the mystery religions ( one name that comes up is helena blovatsky )

they believed that there have been several past human civilisations on earth that all fell and that the one prior to our civilisation had extraordinary powers such as telepathy 

Yeah, I'm totally unfamilar with this.  Source?

it was believed that through breeding with lower beings that the people of this last civilisation devolved into the more primitive state we possess today and as a result the movement hitler joined and essentially came to lead was about restoring man to that lost state of power

Do you know how long we've been breeding animals?  More than 5,000 years.  It wasn't some secret that offspring tend to have the traits of their parents.  Similarly, racisim, nationalism, and antisemitism all proceeded Darwin by many centuries.  There is a reason Europeans thought they had a right to keep African slaves, or to take the land they wished.  Racism and feelings of racial superiority did not come from Darwin.

so no the idea that the evidence is "limited" is not at all true where do you think he pulled this idea of super race that was core to his movement from? 

what does the idea of eugenics and super men have to do with chrisitianity? now again the christian issues you mentioned are interesting but they are peripheral to the main purpose of his movement.

Again, racism and racial superiority do not emerge from Darwin.  Antisemitism has a long history with Christianity, as Hitler frequently cites himself.  The evidence is limited, and the evidence you've provided is non-existant.  Do you have a quote?  A source?

 

"well that's your opinion i demonstrated that it is a very old symbol used in various cultures in the past so its not just some symbol he came up with while daydreaming"

No, it is not my opinion.  It is Hitler's opinion, which he says in Mein Kampf.  The symbol was instituted as the symbol of the Nazi party prior to Hitler's becoming Chariman.  He explains why he designed the flag as he did in Mein Kampf.

"your currency also has in god we trust while showing symbology from egypt a civlisation from thousands of years before christiniaty

does this not strike you as odd? how do you know which god is being spoken of?"

Which is precisely my point.  You can't claim Christian was a pagan based on one symbol any more than you can claim the US worships Egypt or Hercules based on the sybols they've used. 

On a side note, In God We Trust is certainly a reference to the Christian god.  It was added to US currency during the Cold War, as a reaction to the atheistic regime in the soviet union.

"no it has everything to do with this because it is out of the worship of things like the sun that these religions came from and out of these religions we get ideas like a "super race"

but then again i suppose that depends on your perspective to most people i'm just babbling nonsense about doodles i guess"

Yes you are, because you're providing no evidence of anything you're saying, and you're not connecting in any way to the idea of atheism, which you have repeatedly shown you do not grasp. I seriously have no idea what worship of the sun has to do with atheism, because I assur you atheists do not worship the sun.

"atheism didn't start with anyone on this forum or your parents so ultimately atheistic ideas were passed down to you by other people"

No.  You are showing every time that you use the word atheist that you do not know what it means.

EVERY person was an atheist when they were born.  We are born without a belief in god, or even with the ability to have such abstract beliefs.  Atheism cannot be passed on, because there is no such thing as an "atheist belief."  Atheists do not believe anything on the basis of their atheism.  Atheism is a lack of belief in any deity. Nobody had to teach me that yahweh was not real (although I did have religious education) any more than they had to teach you that Thor was not real.

And none of this has any bearing on whether or not Hitler was an atheist.  You seem to be in sore need of a dictionary if you believe that paganism and atheism are the same thing. Even IF atheism arose from paganism (it didn't) that wouldn't make Hitler an atheist any more than being Jewish would make someone a Muslim (which did come out of Judaism).

"now as i said through my own research i know for a fact that the priests of the old mystery religions are atheists not in the sense that they absolutely do not believe in god

but that their god is intellect, rationality, the achievements of man that man will ultimately use to dominate nature as god himself

this is where the idea of man being god that is seen so frequently in new age cults comes from."

And again, this is not atheism.  Atheists might have a high reverence for the intellect of man, or they may not.  They could think that mankind is generally stupid and deserves to be wiped out.

To be perfectly clear, atheism is the lack of a belief in a deity.  It has nothing to do with the worship of man, the worship of the sun, or the worship of human intellect.

 

None of this has any bearing on whether or not Hitler was an atheist.  You have done nothing to dispute the idea that Hitler was a christin, and have provided no evidence to suggest he was an atheist.  Your conflation of paganism with atheism is baffling, and you have repeatedly shown that you do not know what atheism is.  If you wish to continue this discussion, start with presenting a clear view of what you think atheism is, because you clearly do not think that atheism is atheism.  Also, if you are going to make claims, provide some source for them, because it seems like you're just speaking from your bckground knowledge, which seems sketchy at best.

or perhaps saying that christians are essentially pagans as you have been saying; any christians reading that would be appauled that you could suggest something like that... i would think that this should make it evident that things are not always so black and white when we are talking about the origins of these concepts but i guess that some people cannot grasp this

Can you please show me where I've said that Christians are essentially pagans?  If you cannot, please apologize for lying.  I don't appreciate being misrepresented.


"why do you think he would narrow the group of human beings he considered worthwhile to one subsection and eliminate the rest while speaking of a super race?

as i said it was about survival of the group of humans his ideology chose as the fittest - the aryans

the aryans were chosen as the group of humans fit for the evolutionary leap to the next stage whereas the rest would be eliminated... to ultimately wipe out the portions of the human race they considered to be less advanced leaving only the aryans

lol do you think he just got up one day and came up with this bullshit arbitrarily with no purpose? what did you think his purpose was?

oh here we go just found this article on it : http://www.creationism.org/csshs/v08n3p24.htm"

Once upon a time there were happy groups of people called the gypsies, the gays, the mentally disabled and the Jews.  Everyone was just lovely to them, and they were never ever ever the subject of violence or discrimination.  Then, Dawin wrote a book, and all of the sudden everyone hated them!

Is that what you're suggesting happened?  Every group of people Hitler persecuted was persecuted long before Darwin.  And again, I fail to see what Darwin has to do with Atheism.   Believing in evolution does not prevent you from belieing in god.  See for example, the pope.

Oh, and do you notices how your source does not include any direct quotes, any laws (like the ones regarding the banning of books on evolution), or anything close to primary evidence?  Their speculation is no better than yours without evidence. And, I'm somewhat dubious of a site called creationism.org providing a balanced view.  Speaking of evidence, have some more.

"We demand freedom for all religious confessions in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or conflict with the customs and moral sentiments of the Germanic race. The party as such represents the standpoint of a positive Christianity, without owing itself to a particular confession...."


- Article 20 of the program of the German Workers' Party (later named the National Socialist German Workers' Party, NSDAP)

Adolf Hitler: I am a Catholic

I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.

- Adolf Hitler, to General Gerhard Engel, 1941
Adolf Hitler: Religious Life as the Highest and Most Desirable Ideal
I had excellent opportunity to intoxicate myself with the solemn splendor of the brilliant church festivals. As was only natural, the abbot seemed to me, as the village priest had once seemed to my father, the highest and most desirable ideal.

- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 1
Adolf Hitler: Personification of the Devil
....the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.

- Adolf Hitler (following the position of Martin Luther), Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 11
Adolf Hitler: Christians Should Deal with Atheistic Jews
And the founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of his estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary, He drove those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God; because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial interests. But at that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude towards the Jews; whereas our modern Christians enter into party politics and when elections are being held they debase themselves to beg for Jewish votes. They even enter into political intrigues with the atheistic Jewish parties against the interests of their own Christian nation.
 - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 11
And, let's also have some quotes regarding atheism, shall we?                   
By its decision to carry out the political and moral cleansing of our public life, the Government is creating and securing the conditions for a really deep and inner religious life. The advantages for the individual which may be derived from compromises with atheistic organizations do not compare in any way with the consequences which are visible in the destruction of our common religious and ethical values. The national Government sees in both Christian denominations the most important factor for the maintenance of our society. ...

- Adolf Hitler, speech before the Reichstag, March 23, 1933, just before the Enabling Act is passed.
Of course, I'm not going to say that Hitler is always an honest guy, but when you look at the fact that he opposed freethought organizations, insisted on religious instruction in school, formed close alliances with the Vatican, and never spoke against Jesus in one recorded instance, you get a pretty solid argument for him being a christian.  So, if you're going to disprove this, you need some actual evidence. 

"Yeah, I'm totally unfamilar with this.  Source?"


"this is a fairly concise article about it  : http://perdurabo10.tripod.com/galleryg/id6.html"

The only thing the article says is that Hitler "bought it". It's interesting, but it needs far more research to support that claim.  Which again, has no bearing on atheism.

agreed and i did not at any time state that they did the ideas i posted there come from the ideology that hitler was following

Your quote seemed to suggest that Darwinism had to be the source of Hitler's ideas because there was no other logical source.  If I misinterpreted you, then my bad.

 

"well if i interpreted you correctly that is nonsense no other race outside of the aryan race was going to be left it wasn't just about destroying the jews as you seem to believe"

There is really no evidence of that in his actions.  He thought that the Aryan race should rule over others, but he only actively sought to exterminate the Jews, Gypsies, the mentally disabled, and gay people.  Even prisoners of war were not killed.

 well good now you know then that you can't take what he said about every aspect of himself at face value

as i demonstrated the swastika and the sun disk go way back before hitler he just adopted them with the beliefs that fueled his movement whether you are willing to accept that or not is not my concern the point is that this is reality

 I already explained about why that symbol was chosen, and that, while it is certainly a pagan symbol, it does not necessarily indicate belief in paganism.  Please stop ripping my quotes out of their context.

"EVERY person was an atheist when they were born."

no that is not true... no one has knowledge of any concepts when they are born meaning they could not possess the concept that there is no god.

What you are describing is not atheism, it is antitheism.  Antitheis is the belief that there is no god.  Atheism is not believing in ny deities.  A baby doesn't have a knowledge of the concept of god, and therefore they do not believe there is a god or any other deity.  This is what atheism is.  It is not believing there is no god (antitheism) it is simply not believing there is a god.

"Atheism cannot be passed on, because there is no such thing as an "atheist belief.""

i thought atheism was the belief that there is no god... how is that not a belief?

That's not what atheism is.  Atheists do not as a rule believe "There is no god".  They believe " I am not convinced there is a god".

Suppose you read an E3 rumor that Shenmue 3 was in development and would be announced at E3, and you said, "I don't know.  I guess I'll wait for E3 to see."  That is the type of attitude an atheist has towards god.  You don't necessarily reject the notion that there is a god (although some might as you can be both an atheist and an antitheist), but you are not convinced by the evidence that there is one.

it all springs from the same root as you mentioned earlier with christianity and paganism 

I didn't mention that... you did...

"edit: i'd also add that catholicism was a perversion of the old christian religion because it was combined with pagan beliefs to produce one religion for  both groups of people"

In the Roman empire, paganism was replaced by Christianity due to the rule of emperor Constantine, who began to enforce Christian doctrine in about 300 AD.  Not because paganism is an extention of Christianity or vice versa.

"let me put it this way if there was not a degree of cultural acceptance for atheism i'm sure you wouldn't be an atheist but because the strangle hold on ideas that religion once had has loosened now people are adopting other belief systems"

I might not express that I'm an atheist, but I would likely still be one, assuming I had access to the same level of information.

"my point is that the precedent had to be set first and that the precedent came out of the old religions that i mentioned earlier since they were once the dominant templates of thought"

I understand the individual words here, but I don't understand how they fit together.  Are you trying to say that because the precedent of atheism came from paganism (which you didn't prove at all but w/e) anyone who is an atheist is a pagan?  If so, then what you're saying is stupid.  If you're trying to say something less stupid, then my apologies.

and that bit is not in question any historian will tell you for example that sun worship was the dominant religion in egypt for most of its reign

I don't know anything about ancient Egypt's religion, I don't care to know more at this moment, and I don't see how it relates to this topic.

as it is defined now yes but it should have been clear that i was speaking of its origins or where it came from or how the precedent was set initially

Which has nothing to do with Hitler being an atheist. I'm going to do this in caps because it is important to derail this line of nonsense.

EVEN IF YOU WERE ABLE TO SHOW THAT ATHEISM NATURALLY FOLLOWS PAGANISM, WHICH YOU DID NOT DO, THAT DOESN'T MAKE PAGANS ATHEISTS.  CHRISTIANITY IS AN EXTENSION OF JUDAISM, BUT THAT DOESN"T MAKE THE POPE JEWISH. 

you mentioned before that christianity now accepts evolution, a few years ago that was not the case but we still call it christianity then as we do now

Reading is fundamental.  I did not say that Christianity accepted evolution.  I said that a Christian CAN accept evolution, and that the Catholic Church DOES accept evolution.  This does not mean that Christians or Christianity or even Catholics accept it as a rule. 

ideas are shaped by the era that they are present in

Which has nothing to do with the topic.


I am seriously and utterly confused as to what point you're trying to make.  Anything resembling an argument is now adrift in a see on non-sequitors, speculation, and unintelligible babble.  Are you saying Hitler was an atheist or a pagan?  Are you trying to say that atheists are pagans?  Are you trying to say that not believing in deities is related to worshipping the sun (which by the way would be neopaganism, and not paganism)?

 

 

 

 

Let's make this really simple.  Your original claim was that Hitler was an atheist.  I presented plenty of evidence that goes against that fact, (and then you went on some kind of rant about paganism).  Do you have any evidence to suggest Hitler was an atheist or were you simply talking out of your ass with the kind of nonsense that creationists tend to use (not saying you're a creationist but it's a common and flawed creationist argument)?

So, if you have any evidence that Hitler was an atheist, as per our current meaning of the word, present it.  If not, then I'll consider my point sufficiently made and be on my merry way.



padib said:
Christopher who?


Christopher Hitchens. I'm actually surprised you aren't already familiar with him. He's perhaps best known as a literary critic; particularly in regards to George Orwell. In the latter part of his life, however, he became a very outspoken atheist.



Around the Network
pearljammer said:
padib said:


Christopher Hitchens. I'm actually surprised you aren't already familiar with him. He's perhaps best known as a literary critic; particularly in regards to George Orwell. In the latter part of his life, however, he became a very outspoken atheist.

Absolutely brilliant speaker, and he was unflinching, and unapologetic towards those who he set his sites on (Mother Theresa, and the Clintons to name a few), god is not Great, is a great book of his.



to clear up a bit of the nazi mess.... god with us(gott mit uns) was a motto of the german military for 500 years. they just didnt wanted to break a tradition.
it was used by the teutonic order and the prussians, and was the the warcry of the swedish saviors of the german christians.



praise be to yevon



NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

generic-user-1 said:
to clear up a bit of the nazi mess.... god with us(gott mit uns) was a motto of the german military for 500 years. they just didnt wanted to break a tradition.
it was used by the teutonic order and the prussians, and was the the warcry of the swedish saviors of the german christians.


Good to know.  But, my point was simply to say that the use of one symbol does not define a whole movement.  Just because they used one pagan symbol doesn't mean hitler was a pagan any more than gott mit uns made the nazis christian.



JWeinCom said:
generic-user-1 said:
to clear up a bit of the nazi mess.... god with us(gott mit uns) was a motto of the german military for 500 years. they just didnt wanted to break a tradition.
it was used by the teutonic order and the prussians, and was the the warcry of the swedish saviors of the german christians.


Good to know.  But, my point was simply to say that the use of one symbol does not define a whole movement.  Just because they used one pagan symbol doesn't mean hitler was a pagan any more than gott mit uns made the nazis christian.

the nazis werent pagan and had nothing to do with paganism. they just used the symbols that were used before to form germany into a nation.  

the pagan elements and symbols were cool back in the time, mostly because of wagner(or more his wife).  

 

and it wasnt just paganism, it was ol history that was IN. our lady liberty stands in the forest, and is a germanic warrior who fought the romans(and faces westwards to intimidate the french with his sword) and was build in the high time of forming the german nation.

they build a lot of pagan themed buildings in that time, another famouse one is the Walhalla memorial in bavaria.

the SS used those thing for propaganda with its Ahnenerbe division. 

they made up alot of the symbolism. the original black sun is 80 years old and you can stand on it(its in a room in a castle, next to a youth hostel were many schools make trips to learn about history)