Cream147 said:
No, you're wrong and Conina is right. If you had actually followed my logic the Xbox One is alive and healthy and the 3DS is looking dead. Conina correctly identified that I was looking at it from an upcoming games basis, rather than a sales basis (though without big hitting games, we can expect a sales decline to follow) |
Dead systems don't sell systems nor games. The 3DS isn't dead because still sells well enough both hardware and software. What you're trying to create is a situation that does not exist yet. You even mentioned E3 is right around the corner and you don't know what's going to happen. If you don't know what's going to happen your post is kinda invalid because you don't take into account concrete information that exists now that prove the system is still selling both hardware and software. Your thesis (that works only for gamers) may go down the drain in a few days. I believe in what we have now and the future based in that information and information about past products. You believe in a situation that still doesn't exist. If you said "the 3DS might be on its way out" would be different but proclame the system dead showing the numbers it is showing... its naive. Besides I said "some people buy systems for the catalog it already has". Why do you think the PS1 and PS2, the original DS, Gameboy continued to sell well after their successors were launched? You should try to understand the industry from the point of view of the market and how it works and not from the point of view of a gamer. There are a lot of potential buyers ready to buy a cheaper, full of games system but for a hardcore gamer its all about the next hardware and the hardcore gamer tend to believe the market is a reflection of their opinions on how the market works. The system might be dead for a hardcore gamer but not for the general public (potential buyers) and defenetely not for Nintendo.