Isn't that how it should be?

Especially when your console of choice is being hammered approx 2:1 worldwide!

Not winning (but at least not last place for the majority of a generation) makes one realign their perspectives as a gamer. Sure last gen I felt superior as a human being simply because 360 had a higher lifetime #, but MS had become too complacent. Ill take 2nd place with MS doing good by us anyday.

Its far from exeptional, a Global study shown 36.7% of people finish there game so they are still over the line.

I generally dont finish games. Except maybe Mario Kart on 50cc.

xbox have more completation because there is less game and can play more before next game, i usually finish 30% of my game, i play to have fun, i don't care if i finish or not a game, all i care its having fun while playing (btw finished the order, bloodborn, last of us and not finished infamous & shadow of mordor)

Pretty much this, most games have around a 30% finish rate. 40% is double the average.

Get off your high horses ppl, the article is not about the quality of The Order nor about Sony games, its using a very short game wich would be super simple to complete as an example to show that ppl dont usualy finish theyre games. This is old news, any game you want to check will have low finish rate regardless of the quality of the game.

I find this quite sad even a game like the Order can't be completed without the possibility of someone getting bored of it.

For me in the nes/snes era the norm was not finishing, and you would fell proud by finishing a game. But in this era for me not to finish a game I paid in full it would be impossible. the only games I leave unfinished is the ones that costed 2-10 bucks and I bought as "Just in case"

The only games I dont finish are the ones I realise I just don't like. Really don't understand the notion of buying games never to finish them.