By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - PS4 vs Xbox One User Interface/OS Benchmarks

Shadow1980 said:
Pretty much confirms my own personal experience with the two systems. The PS4 UI is quick and snappy, while the XBO's feels downright sluggish, even more so than the 360's. Plus I feel that the PS4's UI has a better layout and is easier to use and navigate. While I'm not a huge fan of the current UI for the 360's main dashboard (I preferred the original "blades" layout), it's still better in nearly all respects than the XBO's UI. It was easier to send friend requests, send messages, and check my friends list, it was easier to navigate, and it wasn't terribly sluggish. MS dropped the ball with the XBO's UI this gen. This is one reason why the PS4 still serves as my primary even though I also have an XBO now. The XBO is mainly my "Halo Box," while the PS4 is my "Everything-That-Isn't-Halo-or-Nintendo Box."

I couldn't have said it any better myself... I don't own a wiiu but do own the other two. The only thing I don't like about the ps4s UI is all the tiles on the main screen. I wish I could delete some of those. I also don't like how many steps to go through to turn off a controller. The xbone UI is way too disorganized. Even xbox fan boys should agree with that. 



Around the Network
cpg716 said:
I have both consoles and I prefer the X1 UI over the PS4.. I can't really explain why. I hate that games you have deleted DONT disappear from your list, even if they NO LONGER exist on PS4.. (Betas, etc).

While I am NOT sure if it has happened much since the last big update.. the store use to NOT load 50% or more of the time for me on the PS4.. other said they had the same issue.. it would just sit at a blue screen.. forever (tested if it would load and it never would) .. I would have to restart the PS4 for it to work. For me just altogether I find the XI UI better segmented and more intuitive.. I know some don't agree.. but its my opinion..


Isnt that a good thing? if the games are taken down like silent hills you can redownload them from your library, me thinks?



The XBO does not take that long with a cold boot. I tried it months ago and it was at 40 seconds. Maybe later updates could have slowed it down but I doubt it.
And the rest mode boot takes me maybe 5 seconds. Idk why he manually signs in for the XBO and not the PS4. That is a pathetic comparison.

Profile loading is the biggest problem with the XBO. But the customization on the home screen and snapping are all on the right path. I don't even think the PS4 guys know how snapping works. Its almost like gesture control via the controller how nice it is. Just gotta remember the button commands and you zip through it.

But we all know how much MS likes to change the Xbox OS. I expect big changes around the time Halo 5 releases or in December.



Ruler said:
cpg716 said:
I have both consoles and I prefer the X1 UI over the PS4.. I can't really explain why. I hate that games you have deleted DONT disappear from your list, even if they NO LONGER exist on PS4.. (Betas, etc).

While I am NOT sure if it has happened much since the last big update.. the store use to NOT load 50% or more of the time for me on the PS4.. other said they had the same issue.. it would just sit at a blue screen.. forever (tested if it would load and it never would) .. I would have to restart the PS4 for it to work. For me just altogether I find the XI UI better segmented and more intuitive.. I know some don't agree.. but its my opinion..


Isnt that a good thing? if the games are taken down like silent hills you can redownload them from your library, me thinks?

You also don't have to go into the library very often. At least I don't because whatever app or game I'm using will be right there. With the Xbox I feel like I'm getting dizzy trying to find where everything is. To be honest though my favorite ui is the ps3 xmb over 360, xbone and ps4. 360's is really user friendly though.



Must vary by game, I look at profiles all the time in Evolve and it takes nowhere near 12 seconds.

Cold boot on Xbone is extremely long. Haven't noticed any differences otherwise between the two.



Around the Network
Arkaign said:
Something that could have been done on either or both consoles :

Put in 16GB of on-board SSD memory exclusively for the OS itself, along with the most core apps. The expense would have been trivial, and then other apps/games/etc could still be kept on the HDD. It would also make upgrading HDDs easier (OS and profiles stay, just swap the HDD and update everything again without having to backup anything).

I do like the idea for future instances. That would definitely make the main system apps extremely fast. But I've heard SSD performance degrades after many write cycles. So numerous updates to the system and the OS on that SSD would worsen the performance overtime, no? Correct me if I'm wrong.

The bootup speed was nothing new for me. Since both consoles came out, I noticed how slow the X1 bootup was.



PwerlvlAmy said:
owning both systems, id say this is fairly accurate. I had to save the song in the video too, liked it xD


Me too!



CPU: Ryzen 7950X
GPU: MSI 4090 SUPRIM X 24G
Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE
RAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 32GB DDR5
SSD: Kingston FURY Renegade 4TB
Gaming Console: PLAYSTATION 5
Mr_No said:
Arkaign said:
Something that could have been done on either or both consoles :

Put in 16GB of on-board SSD memory exclusively for the OS itself, along with the most core apps. The expense would have been trivial, and then other apps/games/etc could still be kept on the HDD. It would also make upgrading HDDs easier (OS and profiles stay, just swap the HDD and update everything again without having to backup anything).

I do like the idea for future instances. That would definitely make the main system apps extremely fast. But I've heard SSD performance degrades after many write cycles. So numerous updates to the system and the OS on that SSD would worsen the performance overtime, no? Correct me if I'm wrong.

The bootup speed was nothing new for me. Since both consoles came out, I noticed how slow the X1 bootup was.

Hi Mr. No :

SSD Performance does have a limit (well, wear actually). In the earlier days of SSDs it was a big concern, because it was sort of an unknown area largely. There was a lot of worry that consumer drives would wear out quickly after heavy usage.

Luckily, that proved to be largely not a concern after all, there are some tests out there where the drives undertook truly monumental and inhuman repeated write testing, and they passed beyond anyone's brightest expectations. Consoles are much less write intensive than Windows desktop OS'es are, so as long as the TRIM support and provisioning was set up properly, the SSD for the console should last beyond any conceivable length of time that would be a concern, perhaps decades with heavy use (as the OS section would probably see 1/1000th of the write cycles that a typical Windows PC would see in the same timeframe. All games would still be saving to the HDD, so you'd only really write to it when updating the console OS/firmware, and core apps).

That's not to say that problems haven't been discovered with some models over the years, often poor firmware, bad Q/A, etc. The biggest thing overall is that your average SSD is more reliable than your average HDD, as you have zero moving parts to worry about.

I guess it's elementary now though, the chances of this appearing in the current gen are incredibly low, though if MS is indeed pursuing DDR4 for the slim X1 as heavily rumored (DDR3 prices are rising steadily, and will be harming margins badly if they don't get away from it) : then MS could rework their slim to store the OS on an SSD cache. I doubt they will though, maybe .001% chance :(

I think whatever the next consoles are will certainly skip HDDs though.

Anyway, some quick fun reading :

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/06/17/consumer-grade-ssds-actually-last-a-hell-of-a-long-time/



game installing time is also a huge difference...



Ruler said:
cpg716 said:
I have both consoles and I prefer the X1 UI over the PS4.. I can't really explain why. I hate that games you have deleted DONT disappear from your list, even if they NO LONGER exist on PS4.. (Betas, etc).

While I am NOT sure if it has happened much since the last big update.. the store use to NOT load 50% or more of the time for me on the PS4.. other said they had the same issue.. it would just sit at a blue screen.. forever (tested if it would load and it never would) .. I would have to restart the PS4 for it to work. For me just altogether I find the XI UI better segmented and more intuitive.. I know some don't agree.. but its my opinion..


Isnt that a good thing? if the games are taken down like silent hills you can redownload them from your library, me thinks?


No..  You don't understand.. Its listed the same with ALL other downloaded games.. That doesn't make sense..    X1 was like this, but move it to a different location. You can STILL re-download past apps if you want..  they just don't show up in your LIBRARY along with downloaded apps..  I would rather my actual library not be half full of stuff I deleted of my PS4.



XBLive: cpg716     PSN ID: cpg716  Steam: Luv4Tech77

Predictions on 12/01/15 - Generation 8 Totals:

PS4: 85-95m
X1: 55-65m
WiiU: 20-30m