Trentonater said:
Everyone that blindly hates on the prequels and everything related are the people celebrating the lack of content in this game.
|
I grew up with the prequels. I love the prequels. I'm not hating on them when I don't complain that they're not included, and I'm sure as hell not celebrating a hypothetical lack of content in a game for which we've seen no gameplay. I'm just not going to jump right on some hate train because a game coming out specifically to pair up with a sequel series movie predominantly focuses on Luke and after, or because I can't drive the AT-AT in what's probably going to be a "defend the AT-AT" mode, or because uninformed speculation.
DICE has little reason for me to doubt them. They botched BF4 hard when they were stretched out with finishing up BF3 support, working on MoH multiplayer, and working on five platforms for 4's launch. Battlefront is on three. I by no means excuse 4 for being broken, but this was two years ago, more than enough time to know their limits on the consoles and gimp the PC version accordingly (because EA). Moreover, EA has seemed to at least try to limit DICE since that. Considering they're going ground-up on this game, I was never expecting content-heavy (i.e. Battlefront 2 verbatim because anything else is trash by default) to begin with, because that's the kind of expectation that leads to disappointment and in this game's case unfounded rage. As I said before, if I get a decent-to-good Star Wars shooter that I can enjoy for a year, then I'm sold, because guess what? That's exactly what BF1 was.
You should check out my YouTube channel, The Golden Bolt! I review all types of video games, both classic and modern, and I also give short flyover reviews of the free games each month on PlayStation Plus to tell you if they're worth downloading. After all, the games may be free, but your time is valuable!