By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HollyGamer said:
This going to be good, i really expecting this kind of thread

ill give you guys my Xenoblade Chronicles X Tech analysis, it looks like an early gen 360/ps3 games.lighting is static,  Objects don't cast shadows based on where the light source is, which is very disappointing for a open world game coming out in 2015, RDR has been doing this like 5 years ago, pretty much every open world game uses some form of dymanic lighting, IQ is bad using weak FXAA, charcter models look like ps2 era models, i honestly don't understand how anybody can be impressed by these graphics, oh yeah nintendo fans. just came to tell you guys i told u so, nintendo wiiu is on par or weaker then lastgen consoles.

 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85MkPZ-1qNU watch the full video RDR looks a full generation ahead X on wiiu it's embarrsing.

 



Around the Network
ninjablades123 said:
HollyGamer said:
This going to be good, i really expecting this kind of thread

ill give you guys my Xenoblade Chronicles X Tech analysis, it looks like an early gen 360/ps3 games.lighting is static,  Objects don't cast shadows based on where the light source is, which is very disappointing for a open world game coming out in 2015, RDR has been doing this like 5 years ago, pretty much every open world game uses so form of dymanic lighting, IQ is bad using weak FXAA, charcter models look like ps2 era models, i honestly don't understand how anybody can be impressed by these graphics, oh yeah nintendo fans

 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85MkPZ-1qNU watch the full video RDR looks a full generation ahead X on wiiu it's embarrsing.

 

 

It´s not embarrasing at all, Xenoblade looks absolutely amazing. Also the sense of scale on Xenoblade is nowhere near to be found on Witcher 3, in fact,  is nowhere to be found in any game to date.















So you need to be a nintendo fanboy to enjoy this? 

HA



Ah, looks like a certain ninja snuck in again :p



In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.

Goodnightmoon said:






So you need to be a nintendo fanboy to enjoy this? 

HA


at least post full resolution pics, its easy do do huge scale when the world is so empty lifeless, and the graphics suck so bad, from IQ, to lighting and textures, everything is low qualitiy, especially the ps2 models



ninjablades123 said:


at least post full resolution pics, its easy do do huge scale when the world is so empty lifeless, and the graphics suck so bad, from IQ, to lighting and textures, everything is low qualitiy, especially the ps2 models

kindly go shit up someone elses thread with your fanboy drivel.



Around the Network
ninjablades123 said:


at least post full resolution pics, its easy do do huge scale when the world is so empty lifeless, and the graphics suck so bad, from IQ, to lighting and textures, everything is low qualitiy, especially the ps2 models

Lifeless? LOL

You are just trying to downgrade a game that is not going to be out on your favorite console, you need to be blind to say that this game looks ugly or lifeless.



Goodnightmoon said:
ninjablades123 said:


at least post full resolution pics, its easy do do huge scale when the world is so empty lifeless, and the graphics suck so bad, from IQ, to lighting and textures, everything is low qualitiy, especially the ps2 models

Lifeless? LOL

You are just trying to downgrade a game that is not going to be out on your favorite console, you need to be blind to say that this game looks ugly or lifeless.

Don't bother with him, he's a well know hater and will be banned soon.

The fact that he still uses RDR to downplay XCX is funny, though.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Goodnightmoon said:
ninjablades123 said:


at least post full resolution pics, its easy do do huge scale when the world is so empty lifeless, and the graphics suck so bad, from IQ, to lighting and textures, everything is low qualitiy, especially the ps2 models

Lifeless? LOL

You are just trying to downgrade a game that is not going to be out on your favorite console, you need to be blind to say that this game looks ugly or lifeless.

scale with actual good graphics on lastgen consoles



Tamron said:
ninjablades123 said:


at least post full resolution pics, its easy do do huge scale when the world is so empty lifeless, and the graphics suck so bad, from IQ, to lighting and textures, everything is low qualitiy, especially the ps2 models

kindly go shit up someone elses thread with your fanboy drivel.


its not even about being a fanboy. X looks like shit graphics wise, it deserves no credit,  i just don't understand it, nice art if you're into that, but the graphics suck in every aspect.



ninjablades123 said:

Goodnightmoon said:

Lifeless? LOL

You are just trying to downgrade a game that is not going to be out on your favorite console, you need to be blind to say that this game looks ugly or lifeless.

scale with actual good graphics on lastgen consoles


Oh nice pic from a game 7 times smaller than XCX ;)

Also, some buildings on a plain terrain =/= Scale

And the distance draw is like 5 times smaller.

Anyway, you´ve just been exposed, so this is my last coment to you.