By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Wii U owners! Which publisher is second place?

bunchanumbers said:
Dunban67 said:
Early in the Wii U life span, Ubisoft supported it as much as Nintendo did, maybe more - at least for the games i was purchasing then - so def Ubisoft


Looking back at it, it is pretty clear that Ubisoft believed in the Wii U. Its a shame the sales didn't reflect this belief. I'm really liking what they did with it and what could have been possible.

If they believed in the Wii U, Rayman Legends would have released at launch, as promised.



Around the Network

Now this is an unintentional troll thread if I ever saw one.

But to stay on topic, I suppose Ubisoft deserves the silver medal for their early support. It's too bad that Ubisoft has to be Ubisoft, because I kinda want to like those guys.



Probably koei-tecmo or Activision or Ubisoft. Don't know which one though :P



Activision? with ghosts, black ops 2 and the james bond game.



forest-spirit said:
Now this is an unintentional troll thread if I ever saw one.

But to stay on topic, I suppose Ubisoft deserves the silver medal for their early support. It's too bad that Ubisoft has to be Ubisoft, because I kinda want to like those guys.


I wouldn't say its a unintentional troll thread. Its more like a unintentional Ubisoft appreciation thread. I just found it funny that Ubisoft games ended up with the second biggest spot in my library. Actually I thought that there would be more people who would have said Activision or WB.



Around the Network

seem Ubisoft is the 2nd placed publisher. there are a few as well like Activision and Koei Tecmo too.
Hope Ubisoft would support the Wii U on their new titles.



Ubisoft hands down, i own most of their Wii U games and really enjoyed them. I found Watch Dogs to be a very good game.



mysteryman said:
bunchanumbers said:
Dunban67 said:
Early in the Wii U life span, Ubisoft supported it as much as Nintendo did, maybe more - at least for the games i was purchasing then - so def Ubisoft


Looking back at it, it is pretty clear that Ubisoft believed in the Wii U. Its a shame the sales didn't reflect this belief. I'm really liking what they did with it and what could have been possible.

If they believed in the Wii U, Rayman Legends would have released at launch, as promised.

The Xbox parity clause had something to so with that delay. 



IamAwsome said:
mysteryman said:
bunchanumbers said:


Looking back at it, it is pretty clear that Ubisoft believed in the Wii U. Its a shame the sales didn't reflect this belief. I'm really liking what they did with it and what could have been possible.

If they believed in the Wii U, Rayman Legends would have released at launch, as promised.

The Xbox parity clause had something to so with that delay. 

It also should have remained exclusive, as promised.

I remember back when Rayman Legends was "built for the Wii U" and "impossible on any other system".



Ubisoft takes second place hands down despite my indifference towards them. AC 3 and 4, Child of Light, Rayman Legends, Splinter Cell Blacklist, Zombi U and even Watch Dogs are some of the most fun I had on Wii U. Platinum are a close third, but Ubisoft wins with sheer number of games. Sadly that may change quite soon if Koei Tecmo and Platinum are still bringing more content to the Wii U.