By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Phil Spencer - Virtual Reality Not Yet 'A Thing'

sabvre42 said:
POE said:
GribbleGrunger said:
POE said:

Following your reasoning, why are you against pedohilia? Why are you against other people wanting to have sex with kids?

Dear Lord. That is the most inane comment I've ever seen on any forum in the many years I've been surfing.


:D

 

Other people using headsets is not the same thing as other people trying to have sex with children.

 

Your post was either a troll, or you actually consider pedophilia as socially acceptable.


nope. It was just an example, and no one here has stated a good argument against it.



Around the Network
POE said:


nope. It was just an example, and no one here has stated a good argument against it.

The very fact you require a 'good' argument against what you posted tells me a lot about you. There IS no good argument when someone says something as ridiculous as that.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


POE said:
sabvre42 said:
POE said:
GribbleGrunger said:
POE said:

Following your reasoning, why are you against pedohilia? Why are you against other people wanting to have sex with kids?

Dear Lord. That is the most inane comment I've ever seen on any forum in the many years I've been surfing.


:D

 

Other people using headsets is not the same thing as other people trying to have sex with children.

 

Your post was either a troll, or you actually consider pedophilia as socially acceptable.


nope. It was just an example, and no one here has stated a good argument against it.


Nintendo must be really proud to have you as an unofficial ambasador... atleast I hope you're an unofficial one.



POE said:
GribbleGrunger said:
POE said:

because i dont want to have a helmet in my head while playing videogames.

I might be wrong but I don't think it's against the law to NOT use something. Why are you against other people wanting VR? The only reason Phil Spencer is saying this is because MS are miles behind in this regard.

Following your reasoning, why are you against pedohilia? Why are you against other people wanting to have sex with kids?

are you seriously going around comparing video game hardware to child abuse? if there was one shred of logic in your reasoning then there was no way you could have asked this question. yes, wearing VR is exactly like molesting little children and ruining their lives and hurting them physically, sexually and mentally against there will. 

this is by far the stupidest question i have ever read on VGC, simply disgusting. 



GribbleGrunger said:
POE said:


nope. It was just an example, and no one here has stated a good argument against it.

The very fact you require a 'good' argument against what you posted tells me a lot about you. There IS no good argument when someone says something as ridiculous as that.


im seriously using all the power i have inside me trying not to repsond to this. i already repsonded to his first post... but man.... its like he is asking for it.... fuck.. must... hold... my... self...... 



Around the Network
bananaking21 said:
GribbleGrunger said:
POE said:


nope. It was just an example, and no one here has stated a good argument against it.

The very fact you require a 'good' argument against what you posted tells me a lot about you. There IS no good argument when someone says something as ridiculous as that.


im seriously using all the power i have inside me trying not to repsond to this. i already repsonded to his first post... but man.... its like he is asking for it.... fuck.. must... hold... my... self...... 

 

That's why I think he's pulling a 4chan level troll...



I dunno why people are angry at Phil. This is basically how MS has been operating for years. They are not innovators. The "wait and see if this or that catches on" approach works for them. And why not? Infinite financial resources to penetrate any growing market.



LurkerJ said:

I dunno why people are angry at Phil. This is basically how MS has been operating for years. They are not innovators. The "wait and see if this or that catches on" approach works for them. And why not? Infinite financial resources to penetrate any growing market.


Yep they really finished the cellphone market. Zune is the hit everyone thought it would be. 

 

This idea that MS is just going to buy there way into success regardless of what they do is ridiculous.



GribbleGrunger said:
POE said:

because i dont want to have a helmet in my head while playing videogames.

I might be wrong but I don't think it's against the law to NOT use something. Why are you against other people wanting VR? The only reason Phil Spencer is saying this is because MS are miles behind in this regard.

Trying to obviate POE's reply, I think that one of the reasons for not wanting VR to take off is that developers may get carried away and start making its games with VR in mind, resulting in games that offer sub-par experiences for those who don't use a VR helmet.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:
GribbleGrunger said:
POE said:

because i dont want to have a helmet in my head while playing videogames.

I might be wrong but I don't think it's against the law to NOT use something. Why are you against other people wanting VR? The only reason Phil Spencer is saying this is because MS are miles behind in this regard.

Trying to obviate POE's reply, I think that one of the reasons for not wanting VR to take off is that developers may get carried away and start making its games with VR in mind, resulting in games that offer sub-par experiences for those who don't use a VR helmet.

 

Then don't play games made for VR. How is this different then boycotting crappy ports?