What do you mean? I checked the policies they would implement and it seems pretty fair in regards to immigration if that is what you are referring to.

I think he just want's to make sure your not a criminal and that there's not too many of you coming into the country at once, like most countries around the world do.

That is your opinion, and considering that democracy is what's best for the country don't you think people should have the final say on such an important issue?

Decades ago people were able to vote on joining the EU when they though it was simply a free trade deal, why should the people of today not be allowed to vote.

While I agree that Democracy is one of the worst forms of government their is, so are all the rest of them.

And politicians thrive on the stupidity of the masses as they are skilled politicians and not skilled leaders.

But the one upside of democracy is that it allows peopleto eject the very worst of their leaders after a certain amount of time, like all the politicians who want to remain in the EU.

You mean the Good Friday Agreement? Yeah.. you are right, another referendum would probably end in the same way just a less majority. 

Could you point out the part where I said planning for the countries future is bad?

And while I agree the politicians who want to remain in the EU are the very worst, that seems to imply they are a small fraction where the majority of politicians want in while the majority of people want out.

Immigration is one of the problems with the EU, under better circumstances the UK economy would be dynamic enough to cope with large numbers of immigrants but currently it is not and therefore the immigration system needs to be merit based.

I'm not so sure that's a bad thing. A lot of "intelligent" people out there think they know "what's best for everybody". For example, based on your posting history, I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be too happy with the results if only the University professors in the UK were allowed to vote

Wasn't one of the defenses against Gordon Brown something along the lines of "he's the most intelligent Prime Minister in recent history" (I guess by somekind of measure in academics or IQ, or something).

For major corporations, maybe. For small and medium businesses (who are, by far, the largest employers in the UK) whether or not the EU is net benefit or cost to the benefit is really down to that business and their clients, it can go either way. My father's business primarily trades with China and the USA (as well as other British firms), not much business out of the EU. He still has to comply with all the EU regulations, though. For his business, he'd probably be better off without the EU.

but isnt you 32 years old?

Ha, I agree with your about the intelligence of professors, they're just what common culture perceive to be the peak of intelligence. Well, Uni professors and UN panel members.