Augen said:
NewGuy said: I really want to like and support MLS and see soccer grow in the US. However, truth be told, it is still a poor product. Once they raise the quality on the field, I will be sure to start watching it more closely. |
1. I would say follow a club over a league. Having an invested interest in outcomes makes matches 10x more exciting (least it does for me). Go to a match, experience the atmosphere and realize what makes the sport special all over the world.
2. Level of play is improving and honestly outside a dozen or so league around the world MLS is very respectable. As someone who has watched Japanese, Australian, Danish, Scottish, and Bolivian matches at times it is fine to me vast majority of the matches.
3. The biggest thing I champion about MLS over other leagues people compare it to (speificially Europe) is that at the start of a season in MLS half of the clubs have legitimate hopes of lifting silver ware, compared to 2-4 in big European leagues. This makes it far more engaging to me as through the year who will can shift. Right now Dallas has a great start, but maybe they slip up and Seattle or Los Angeles retakes position or Toronto makes a big move or someone else surprises us.
Of course I cannot convince you and appreciate you being nice about not being a fan.
|
I don't dislike the MLS. I think it's great we have a respectable pro soccer league that's arguably Top 15 in the world and definitely Top 10 in terms of attendance. I simply want to watch a superior product than what I see on the field at MLS matches. I think one problem with MLS is that they sign a lot of big name players in their 30s (Kaka, Beckham, Henry, Villa, Gerrard, Lampard, etc). I have read rumors somewhere that Ronaldo and Messi will be looking to come to America after their contract is up, which, again, will put them in the over 30s category.
If MLS can get to the point where it can sign these players in their primes AND develop an academy where they can groom some young talent, then I think they will be on their way and I will be a fan AND STH. Imagine a young Brazilian like Neymar, a young Colombian like Rodriguez, or a young Argentinian like Messi deciding whether to go to Barca or LAFC, wouldn't that be nice? Or a young european like Ronaldo or Muller, deciding whether to stay in Europe or come to play in the US? That's the point where I'll start watching MLS, I don't want NYCFC to sign Ronaldinho or Robinho or any other past their prime players. Last I heard teams in MLS have no academy system like they do in Europe, hence why we don't have any home grown players. Maybe that's changed in the past few years and you can enlighten me? I hear someone like Yedlin was a product of an academy in Seattle, but I don't know. Really, though, we are a country of 320+ million ethnically diverse individuals, how many young talented boys do you think have fallen through the cracks?
Another issue I have is the fact that MLS and NASL are not working together but trying to compete. I understand the no pro/rel system here and why it won't work for us, but NASL, being a division 2 league, should be working with the MLS not trying to compete against it. The same way USL is doing it now.
Maybe I am being unrealistic and MLS will never be a Top 5 league in the world in terms of quality on the field. I'm sure it'll be there in terms of attendance and stadium quality, but quality on the field is the main issue and one that will get americans saying "The big 5" instead of "The big 4" major professional sports.