By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - sean penn is a hypocrite.

He's an actor. He works for a paycheck, just like most of the rest of us.

I work at a convenience store. I'm against alcohol abuse. Does that mean I ought to refuse to sell booze to people that I know are alcoholics? No. If you are a consenting adult, it's your choice if you wish to cause harm to your own body. It's not my place to interfere. You're going to live how you want to live.

Actors portray others in film and television.  It doesn't have any correlation to their beliefs in real life.  If Jeff Daniels plays a plantation owner in the south during the 1830's in a film, it doesn't mean that he's pro-slavery.  How silly would it be if someone were to crticize Jeff Daniels in real life for protraying a historicial figure in a film?   Pretty darn silly.  He's pretending to be somebody else for money. 

Sean Penn is a very progressive person.  He supports anti-gun legislation and he is generally very liberal.  He plays other people when he's at work.  It doesn't have anything to do with his personal beliefs.  You might not like it, or you might even argue that it's ironic.  It's not hypocrisy, though.



The Screamapillar is easily identified by its constant screaming—it even screams in its sleep. The Screamapillar is the favorite food of everything, is sexually attracted to fire, and needs constant reassurance or it will die.

Around the Network

Depends on whether he complained about the glorification of guns in media or whether he is just against general gun ownership. They are 2 different things.

Everyone in the UK watches films with guns+plays games which feature games but very few support the idea of gun ownership outside of hunting.



The Gunman is about a government agent, isn't it? The movie isn't about "gun nuts".



McDonaldsGuy said:
You guys are making a mistake. This isn't a vegetarian eating a steak for a role; or a Jew playing a Nazi. This is GLORIFYING gun violence. That's the difference. Movies with Nazis don't glorify them and if they do, people WILL question the crew's motives. People don't make a movie glorifying RAPE, and if they do, once again people WILL question them. No, Nazis and rapists always tend to be villains.


I agree with this. people that are giving these other examples aren't seeing the hypocrisy here. No he's not really shooting guns,but he's glorifying them. If you feel  that strongly against guns,yet you'll take that big paycheck to star in a movie called the gunman. Just like what jim carrey did in kick ass 2 and what liam nesson did with the taken movies. lol



Screamapillar said:

He's an actor. He works for a paycheck, just like most of the rest of us.

I work at a convenience store. I'm against alcohol abuse. Does that mean I ought to refuse to sell booze to people that I know are alcoholics? No. If you are a consenting adult, it's your choice if you wish to cause harm to your own body. It's not my place to interfere. You're going to live how you want to live.

Actors portray others in film and television.  It doesn't have any correlation to their beliefs in real life.  If Jeff Daniels plays a plantation owner in the south during the 1830's in a film, it doesn't mean that he's pro-slavery.  How silly would it be if someone were to crticize Jeff Daniels in real life for protraying a historicial figure in a film?   Pretty darn silly.  He's pretending to be somebody else for money. 

Sean Penn is a very progressive person.  He supports anti-gun legislation and he is generally very liberal.  He plays other people when he's at work.  It doesn't have anything to do with his personal beliefs.  You might not like it, or you might even argue that it's ironic.  It's not hypocrisy, though.

Are you advertising the beer yourself? By glorifying guns in a movie he advertises it as well. If you starred in a beer commercial, then yes, you would be a hypocrite.

If he was a villain, and really evil and used guns, that'd be different.

I don't know what this movie is about though, so I am speaking in general. Like how Liam Neeson is against guns yet his movies always glorify them.

If Jeff Daniels played a plantation owner in a movie, it'll likely not glorify it. He'd either be a villain, or an anti-hero. Never glorified or look "cool" and good. If Jeff Daniels made a movie where the plantation owner is a hero, and promotes slavery clearly, then yes him choosing that role is questionable and hypocritical.



Around the Network
oldschoolfool said:
McDonaldsGuy said:
You guys are making a mistake. This isn't a vegetarian eating a steak for a role; or a Jew playing a Nazi. This is GLORIFYING gun violence. That's the difference. Movies with Nazis don't glorify them and if they do, people WILL question the crew's motives. People don't make a movie glorifying RAPE, and if they do, once again people WILL question them. No, Nazis and rapists always tend to be villains.


I agree with this. people that are giving these other examples aren't seeing the hypocrisy here. No he's not really shooting guns,but he's glorifying them. If you feel  that strongly against guns,yet you'll take that big paycheck to star in a movie called the gunman. Just like what jim carrey did in kick ass 2 and what liam nesson did with the taken movies. lol

When you saw the Movie that he is in (the Gunman), what was his character doing?  Did his character hand out guns to the poor and tell them to use them to get whatever they want?  Did his character use guns to perpetrate a crime?  

I haven't seen the movie and obviously you have to make this generalization based on a movie title.  Please tell us about the movie so we can have a way to reference your point.



It is near the end of the end....

Anti gun, not anti acting...

It's like saying the guys who play the bad guys in movies (maybe even Hitler) are hypocrites if they say they are nice in real life...



He also tied up and beat Madonna but nobody seems to care about that. It was a long time ago but it's not like Chris Brown will ever live it down. I get the impression that he can do what he wants and Hollywood and most others will support him.



Mnementh said:
oldschoolfool said:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/02/04/sean-penn-slams-private-gun-ownership-in-2013-stars-in-the-gunman-in-2015/  ---link to article. sean penn is all anti gun,but yet he stars in a movie called the gunman. I mean how hypocritical can one be? jim carrey and liam nesson are also examples of hollywood actors being hypocrites. I'm not anti gun,but I'm also not a hardcore gun-nut. I like these actors that I mentioned,but I think they just need to shut up when it comes to guns. At the very least practice what you preach. So is anyone going to watch the gunman,which has the same director as taken? discuss.

If an actor who is against Nazis depicts Hitler, is he a hypocrite?

 

haha..this for sure.



OP, i think this is what you're looking for

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr37b-FYj8g