Yes but only for games on Sony platforms

Samus Aran is actually arguing the same point here as you are making. He/she is saying exactly this to Lawlight; there are way worse offenders than Nintendo that Lawlight chooses to ignore. Nintendo usually don't make annual releases, and when a new instalment is released there's usually something new in them.

Not too surprising... was to be expected

What people are ignoring it seems is that the article makes it clear that this is about a rotten *minority* composed of small to midrange sites that need traffic. But nope, there will be people who will take the "evidence" from this article and use it whenever a reviewer hurts their feelings. Wonderful.

Im a little late anyways since you already made a simmilar comment also going futher into detail than me. But I regret nothing.

Although Im not going against samus on my comment, was actually agreeing and trying to expand on it. Sorry if it sounded like otherwise.

Do sony's games suffer the most because they usually get the most online attention?

Giving heavy rain a 4 was just pure sick btw.

What you seem to be ignoring is that people who g online to forums and read reviews and leave comment are always right and have the best taste that cannot be question. Now this article gives them proof that they have been right all along and will use it as in the future anybody dosent like the game they love has to be because of clickbait lower scores. Now theres undeniable proof.

Haha I might have been me reading it all wrong so no sweat =)

You are burrying your head in the sand and pretending the situation is all paranoia except for "Isolated cases"

If you think major sites don't stoop to such tactics to remain relevant, you're being way too nieve.

Nothing raidiant in terms of what's over the sun, but a trend that will continue I am afraid. Sickens me to swe a form of work that I will one day want to do be mutated into something terrible.