By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - It's possible to outsell a competitor by selling less

DonFerrari on 27 February 2015

Or so claims some experts and analyst.

 

In fact when you sell 91% of what your competitor sells there is no objective proof that you won't outsell your competitor globally in USA.

 

Anyone can disprove this analyst with computer sciencies degree?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
alabtrosMyster on 27 February 2015

Please site us some example, I have seen forum posts that implied it, but I'd have to see their math to be able to point out any errors, otherwise I have to assume they are of good faith and believe they are right

It's like saying 900p is more fun than 1080p! can't argue with that!



IIIIITHE1IIIII on 27 February 2015
DonFerrari said:

Or so claims some experts and analyst.

 

In fact when you sell 91% of what your competitor sells there is no objective proof that you won't outsell your competitor globally in USA.

 

Anyone can disprove this analyst with computer sciencies degree?


VGChartz has proven several times over that this statement is true.



DonFerrari on 27 February 2015
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
DonFerrari said:

Or so claims some experts and analyst.

 

In fact when you sell 91% of what your competitor sells there is no objective proof that you won't outsell your competitor globally in USA.

 

Anyone can disprove this analyst with computer sciencies degree?


VGChartz has proven several times over that this statement is true.

I see what you done there.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

oniyide on 27 February 2015

You are bad



Around the Network
DonFerrari on 27 February 2015
alabtrosMyster said:
Please site us some example, I have seen forum posts that implied it, but I'd have to see their math to be able to point out any errors, otherwise I have to assume they are of good faith and believe they are right

It's like saying 900p is more fun than 1080p! can't argue with that!


Well 720p=1080p so 900p is clearly better



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

LivingMetal on 27 February 2015

My bizarro counterpart emphatically says, "Yes."



Conegamer on 27 February 2015

It's pretty obvious what your intentions were for this thread. It's clearly a reaction to this thread: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=192716&page=1.

Reaction threads are prohibited on VGC and hence it shall be locked.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.