By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - If i can finish Gears of Wars on 5-6 hours long, 12 hours campaign on The Order 1886 is not that bad

HollyGamer on 19 February 2015
jlmurph2 said:
HollyGamer said:
Rafux said:
HollyGamer said:

The fact is The order have both Quality and Quantity,   depending on who play the game.

So much quality that they have to re skin the final boss.

That's your opinion, have you play the game? Not watched the game. neither I have play the game, that's why nobody is able to judge the game especially quality is based on opinion and game length is solely is different for many people.


Reskinning the final boss isn't an opinion.

well it's opinion if you judge the game by looking it not playing it. Even if you play the game it depend on how skill you have.



Around the Network
TheSting on 19 February 2015
Kerotan said:
It's about the same as gears but as tiffac says it's a high profile exclusive. That's the main reason.


I see what you two are trying to say but there are PS4 only players dumping on it to.

Just buy the game if you want then come out with your own opinion. Tooooooo simple. 



hudsoniscool on 19 February 2015
platformmaster918 said:
mii-gamer said:
This is going beyond the point of ridiculous. Length is one of may concerns relating to the Order 1886 and was the straw that broke the camels back regarding whether the Order 1886 was going to be a somewhat decent game.

Comparing another games length, while simultaneously ignoring what the title also offers, in an attempt to justify one shortcoming of the Orders 1886 while simultaneously ignoring the other shortcomings is somewhat... I'd rather not say, in fear of getting banned.

shortcomings or just things you didn't like?  Black bars, focusing on SP, linearity, QTE, and cover based TPS gameplay are purely preference.  If you don't like them fine but don't say "it's bad" because of them just say "I don't like these things"


I guess the infinitely respawning AI (and in the same exact spot, and doing the exact same thing before being killed) is not a "short coming" its just a "preference".



Halo MCC will sell 5+ million copies(including digital)

halo 5 will sell 10 million copies(including digital)

x1 will pass ps4 in USA, and UK.

jlmurph2 on 19 February 2015
HollyGamer said:
jlmurph2 said:
HollyGamer said:

That's your opinion, have you play the game? Not watched the game. neither I have play the game, that's why nobody is able to judge the game especially quality is based on opinion and game length is solely is different for many people.


Reskinning the final boss isn't an opinion.

well it's opinion if you judge the game by looking it not playing it. Even if you play the game it depend on how skill you have.

Isn't it opinion to blindly love a game by looking at it and not playing it?



mii-gamer on 19 February 2015
platformmaster918 said:
mii-gamer said:
This is going beyond the point of ridiculous. Length is one of may concerns relating to the Order 1886 and was the straw that broke the camels back regarding whether the Order 1886 was going to be a somewhat decent game.

Comparing another games length, while simultaneously ignoring what the title also offers, in an attempt to justify one shortcoming of the Orders 1886 while simultaneously ignoring the other shortcomings is somewhat... I'd rather not say, in fear of getting banned.

shortcomings or just things you didn't like?  Black bars, focusing on SP, linearity, QTE, and cover based TPS gameplay are purely preference.  If you don't like them fine but don't say "it's bad" because of them just say "I don't like these things"

You are missing the point! None of those are inherently bad in a game. It's all about the execution.  It's the execution of these component in the order 1886 which has raised real concerns among the media and the community.