By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - If i can finish Gears of Wars on 5-6 hours long, 12 hours campaign on The Order 1886 is not that bad

HollyGamer on 19 February 2015
Rafux said:
HollyGamer said:
jlmurph2 said:
Captain_Yuri said:
HollyGamer said:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-02-16-ready-at-dawn-responds-to-concern-over-the-order-1886s-campaign-length

So what do you want me to look at cause I can't really see them saying it lasted 12 hours or more?

Looks like they're defending their short playtime by saying "Quality over Quantity".

The fact is The order have both Quality and Quantity,   depending on who play the game.

So much quality that they have to re skin the final boss.

That's your opinion, have you play the game? Not watched the game. neither I have play the game, that's why nobody is able to judge the game especially quality is based on opinion and game length is solely is different for many people.



Around the Network
SjOne on 19 February 2015

It doesn't have any multiplayer to extend the replay value that's the main complaint



platformmaster918 on 19 February 2015
mii-gamer said:
This is going beyond the point of ridiculous. Length is one of may concerns relating to the Order 1886 and was the straw that broke the camels back regarding whether the Order 1886 was going to be a somewhat decent game.

Comparing another games length, while simultaneously ignoring what the title also offers, in an attempt to justify one shortcoming of the Orders 1886 while simultaneously ignoring the other shortcomings is somewhat... I'd rather not say, in fear of getting banned.

shortcomings or just things you didn't like?  Black bars, focusing on SP, linearity, QTE, and cover based TPS gameplay are purely preference.  If you don't like them fine but don't say "it's bad" because of them just say "I don't like these things"




Get Your Portable ID!Lord of Ratchet and Clank

Duke of Playstation Plus

Warden of Platformers

HollyGamer on 19 February 2015

It's funny how people judge games by watching videos, and listen to people opinion.



jlmurph2 on 19 February 2015
Normchacho said:
jlmurph2 said:

Why didn't you use this site for Wolfenstein's playthrough time? There's like 300 players recorded.


What? I did earlier...The average time is about 13 hours. I was making the point that LP are usually a good deal shorter than the average play through time. I tested this theory against a couple of other games aswell, but it just so happens that somebody on Gaf used TNO and it works out to almost the same gameplay/cutscene ratio.

 

If you meant in this post than I didn't because that will be the source for the average play time for The Order. Which, I suspect will end up being a good bit longer than 5 or 6 hours, based on the reports we've been hearing.

Aren't Lets Plays usually full no death walkthroughs from like a 2nd or 3rd playthrough and that's what makes them shorter? Was that the case in the deleted video?



Around the Network
onionberry on 19 February 2015
platformmaster918 said:
onionberry said:

GOW is pure gameplay plus cool multiplayer, we'll have to see if the order can be a GOOD short experience.

Only GoW Ascension had multiplayer though and the SP campaign was good enough to justify the purchase just like all the others


I'm talking about gears of war lol



jlmurph2 on 19 February 2015
HollyGamer said:
Rafux said:
HollyGamer said:

The fact is The order have both Quality and Quantity,   depending on who play the game.

So much quality that they have to re skin the final boss.

That's your opinion, have you play the game? Not watched the game. neither I have play the game, that's why nobody is able to judge the game especially quality is based on opinion and game length is solely is different for many people.


Reskinning the final boss isn't an opinion.



leo-j on 19 February 2015

God of war was 6 hours long tho.....



 

mM
jlmurph2 on 19 February 2015
HollyGamer said:
It's funny how people judge games by watching videos, and listen to people opinion.


Well...yeah. Seeing and word of mouth are good ways to judge. Especially for a game that's cinematic.



walsufnir on 19 February 2015
HollyGamer said:
It's funny how people judge games by watching videos, and listen to people opinion.


It's funny how people don't watch the videos which prove many points they insist to ignore and listen to people's opinions.