By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Issues with IGN's MM3D Score

 

Is IGN full of idiots?

Yes 228 67.66%
 
No 109 32.34%
 
Total:337

It's not like they start with 10 points and remove some for each thing they don't like... IThe rest of the game isn't perfect and utterly flawless..



Around the Network
TheGoldenBoy said:
So you're telling me that someone is an idiot because they have a different opinion than you?

It's not about IGN having a different opinion, it's about them giving an unjustified score. 



People are really trying to defend IGN on this one. I wonder how many of them would still be, if this game was a Vita exclusive instead.

IGN gave the horrible porting mess that is Silent Hill HD collection a 9. They gave Master Chief Collection a 9 too, and it's main attraction hasn't been fixed yet. I think the Agenda it's obvious.



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)

vivster said:

How are they full of idiots if they gave the original 9.9?

Also how about reading the full review and not just the bullet points at the end?


You do realise those were different reviewers who actually played Nintendo games for over 15 years. IGN is jsut a shell of it's former glory.

However, I do agree that he shoudl read the full review.



 

 

Squeezol said:
TheGoldenBoy said:
So you're telling me that someone is an idiot because they have a different opinion than you?

It's not about IGN having a different opinion, it's about them giving an unjustified score. 

What about the score is unjustified?



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network
FunFan said:
People are really trying to defend IGN on this one. I wonder how many of them would still be, if this game was a Vita exclusive instead.

IGN gave the horrible porting mess that is Silent Hill HD collection a 9. They gave Master Chief Collection a 9 too, and it's main attraction hasn't been fixed yet. I think the Agenda it's obvious.

Oh boy, we still have people trying to paint IGN with an anti-Nintendo agenda?

Oh no, a 8.7... at least Galaxy got Game of the Generation thanks to IGN and thank goodness they gave Smash WiiU a 9.8 and Mario Kart 8 a 9 or even thanks that they gave A Link Between Worlds a 9.4.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

outlawauron said:
Squeezol said:

It's not about IGN having a different opinion, it's about them giving an unjustified score. 

What about the score is unjustified?

If a game was a 9.9 in 2000 then it is a 9.9 or better in 2015. Should have been a 10.1/10 at least.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Zelda Water Temples are hard for IGN.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Cobretti2 said:
vivster said:

How are they full of idiots if they gave the original 9.9?

Also how about reading the full review and not just the bullet points at the end?


You do realise those were different reviewers who actually played Nintendo games for over 15 years. IGN is jsut a shell of it's former glory.

However, I do agree that he shoudl read the full review.

Yes I do realize that but I wonder if OP does.

Why should a completely different reviewer adhere to a score that another reviewer set?



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

I would not have given the original Majora's Mask more than 8, I don't think it deserves a classic game status, like OoT does by example.

Note that I only played them on the N64, didn't try any remake.