By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Do you think kids under 18 should have sex with each other?

 

Should 18 or under kids/teens have sex?

Hell yeah why couldnt they? 133 57.58%
 
Ehh That would make their lives hell 43 18.61%
 
Im neutral 55 23.81%
 
Total:231
GribbleGrunger on 14 February 2015

I live in the UK.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Around the Network
OfficerRaichu15 on 14 February 2015

Oh havent posted why Im neutral
I believe it would be fine as other have said if they were 15-17
but younger then that they wouldnt be ready



Bets:

(Won)Bet with TechoHobbit: He(Techno) says 10 million by January 1,2014 I say 9 million by then. Winner gets 2 weeks of sig control.

(Lost)Bet with kinisking: I say Ps4 will win April NPD while he says Xbox One will win it; winner gets 1 week of avatar control.

Raichu's First Series:

First RPG?

First Fighter?

First Racer?

First Shooter?

First MMO?

First Horror?

Official Ni No Kuni Fanboy:

Familiars Captured:37

Game Beaten: 2 times almost

Times I got teary during some scenes: 3

beeje13 on 14 February 2015

I think non penatrative is ideal, and in a long term relationship. Fellatio is a great way for them to discover their kinky parts. It's complicated though, where do you draw the line?



PS, PS2, Gameboy Advance, PS3, PSP, PS4, Xbox One

gergroy on 14 February 2015

No, kids are too driven by hormones and immature to engage in an activity like this that can have so many long term consequences. Even the "mature" kids aren't ready for it. I have been a teacher now for 3 years now, and I have already seen quite a few lives ruined by engaging in sex at too young an age.



POE on 14 February 2015

YES!!



Around the Network
Proxy-Pie on 14 February 2015

Even many adults shouldn't have children, so no.



aLkaLiNE on 14 February 2015
Mnementh said:
aLkaLiNE said:
SkyHold said:
RCTjunkie said:
Like be required? Heck no.
Legally? I am morally against pre marital sex but if they are going to do it they should at least be safe and knowledgeable. I think around age 14 there should be an age appropriate but frank discussion about safe sex and work towards prevention of diseases and teen pregnancy instead of overall rebellion causing unneeded consequences

I alsoways find it strange that religion finds sex a moral thing.It's nature and has nothing to do with morals or religion.That's like saying what you eat is a moral.There is a reason why sex is pleasurable and why people can have sex with multiple people.Nature intended us to have mutliple lovers and prcreate as much a possible while enjoying the act itself.At one point marriage did not exist.

I'm agnostic, not religious in any way. But I do believe everything is connected. With that being said your logic is 2 dimensional and very atheistic in tone. How can you say what is and isn't nature? Pleasure is just as much an emotion as it is a feeling. Would you have sex with someone ugly who had a rude personality just because it felt good? Would you be more inclined to sleep with the woman of your dreams? Emotion and feelings come into play 100% of the time. Is that supposed to be nature? Why can't we hear trees scream when we cut them down?

Is that supposed to be nature?

Emotion are an evolutionary tool, so yes, emotions are part of nature of beings with higher developed central nervous system.

Why can't we hear trees scream when we cut them down?

Because they don't have lungs. Or a central nervous system. But it can be measured internal stress of some sort.

That wasn't a direct question. It was designed to challenge how others percieve reality with the point being that just because you can't hear or see something doesn't mean it isn't happening.  

I'll hope that you have a look at this.

http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-01-09/new-research-plant-intelligence-may-forever-change-how-you-think-about-plants

Science is consistently discovering itself wrong. I don't actually think any theory we have is absolute.  It's a giant spiderweb of wrong ideas that hold some truth but not complete truth, otherwise I think we would have certain things figured out.  With the current state of humanity, the way we've adapted technology to ourselves is in my honest opinion the wrong path. I don't put all my faith in science, I don't put all my faith in chance, but rather there seems to be a medium between what man can find out, and what happens for a reason.  Therefore love, hate, jealousy, happiness, sadness... those can't simply be explained.  There's either an extra dimension or another layer to the matter that makes up everything that we cannot percieve and sex isn't -just- a tool that is to be exploited because it makes you feel good.  Again, if it were that simple then people wouldn't choose who they mate with. Marriage didn't used to be a thing but I garuntee that before that there was a man and a woman who saw in each other the kind of friendship that bonded them for life.  They had no obligation to be with each other, but they wanted to. The concept of marriage is almost entirely based around this idea now a days.



Soleron on 14 February 2015

It's going to happen no matter how many rules are put in place to stop it.

All society can do is i) educate about how to deal with the result physically and emotionally and ii) provide non-judgemental support through schools and through the health system.