I alsoways find it strange that religion finds sex a moral thing.It's nature and has nothing to do with morals or religion.That's like saying what you eat is a moral.There is a reason why sex is pleasurable and why people can have sex with multiple people.Nature intended us to have mutliple lovers and prcreate as much a possible while enjoying the act itself.At one point marriage did not exist.

Duh, of course. sex is nobody's business except for the people involved, as long as it's consent + other common sense stuff.

Probably not, but what can ya do?

I believe in waiting until you find someone you actually love, but in general, as long as you're 16 and both parties consent then it's fine by me.

SkyHold, what and when you eat certain things is a moral aspect to some religions.  Also with the way we are currently populating the planet and how long we are living I'd say now is a time where we really need to start watching how much we procreate (which although a result of the sexual act - should in my mind be differentiated from the act itself)

I'm agnostic, not religious in any way. But I do believe everything is connected. With that being said your logic is 2 dimensional and very atheistic in tone. How can you say what is and isn't nature? Pleasure is just as much an emotion as it is a feeling. Would you have sex with someone ugly who had a rude personality just because it felt good? Would you be more inclined to sleep with the woman of your dreams? Emotion and feelings come into play 100% of the time. Is that supposed to be nature? Why can't we hear trees scream when we cut them down?

Of course.

In what world do you live were sex=baby and were you get grounded for having it? Wow.

I mean... It's not like anyone can stop them from what they're already doing.

How could you stop them? Once there is not a age gap of more than a year or two I don't see the problem. Plus it would better if they were protected, nothing worse than unsafe sex, believe me.

PG is no way to beeeeee!