A minimum amount of intelligence is required to be feminist, so no.

intelligent people can also be crazy or as you put it "nuts"

not that i actually agree that intelligence is a requirement for feminists anyway... some of the claims i see being made lead me to believe otherwise

Pretty much 90% of modern day feminists are.

The feminists who actually made a difference and fought for good, true reasons are long gone now.

Now feminists fight for stories to be changed in entertainment mediums, feminists censor freedom of speech (e.g. the girl from TBBT who said she loves to cook for her husband, feminist group forced an apology from her), and to remove female models from non-porn mediums (i.e. Page 3 / lads mags etc.)

I get that general concensus, I still think it's wrong too refuse a baby a life.

Authorities should essentially force her to have the baby then put it up for adoption, many couples out there who can't have babies and would be willing to get one of those evil 'XY' chromosomed babies

FEMINISM ISN'T A FACEBOOK GROUP OR A GROUP FOR THAT MATTER.

A feminist is anyone who works towards equality, particularly by focusing on the needs of the opressed/less valued, in feminism case, that being the females.

She is a feminist at the end of the day. A very stupid, evil, unfair and disgusting one, but a feminist nevertheless. There's no subscription, no entry-requirements. As long as you agree with the belief of equality and act to make women more equal, you're a feminist.

She acted, stupidly, but she did.

For feminist, a good boy is a dead boy.

So if the feminist could choose who have the right to live, how many of us would be here?

And people claim "abortion" is nothing and feminist is cool...

A woman willing to kill a male child because its male is sexist, not feminist.

And this woman got pregnant by a...

A stork carrying the seed to the mother OBVIOUSLY

Prediction: This is a hoax by the woman, who is intending on drawing attention to the pattern of female children being aborted in places like China, India, etc, which doesn't get much attention in most situations.

I think this because surely she had to be aware that a claim like the one that she has made would do nothing to further the cause she claims to be fighting for, and instead gives a lot of fuel for people to use against that cause. Note that this isn't talking about actual abortion for that reason, but the part where it's broadcast publicly as being for that reason.

On the other hand, if she didn't really do it, then it would be an effective method of drawing attention to the issue.

Of course, if she really did it, then she is a disgusting human being, and should be regarded as an example of the statement "Every group has plenty of demons" (from a scene in the pilot of The West Wing). But I really hope my prediction is right.