Mine was "Gamecube, it deserved those sales though due to a lack of third party content especially Gta which was hot at the time."
"fuck you all Wii U is awesome 3D world is the best game in the last 3 years.
This post has been moderated by axumblade"
I originally joined this site to troll but then ended up really enjoying it.
My history won't go back that far for some reason
Interestingly enough, my first post was about the PS Vita
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4363138
Here's mine:
Fusioncode said:
|
Oh God what the hell was wrong with me.
Sigs are dumb. And so are you!
"I wouldn't be surprised if they announced an Xbox equivalent of the streaming feature the PS4 is set to have. Though hopefully they enlist TwitchTV for this and not ustream... I honestly can't understand Sony's logic in not partnering up with the dedicated gaming stream service (which might I add is actually a more popular streaming site than ustream in visiting numbers). Though perhaps they tried and failed during negotiations?"
In the end they did announce an Xbox equivalent, and it was for TwitchTV! 
Fortunately Sony realized the benefit of using twitch too.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5912715
Taking me all the way back to that cheesy commercial, still love it.
Lyrics: He He He He Ha Ha Ha!
| pokoko said: I loved Dragon Age: Origins. I also loved Dragon Age 2. Both are flawed, both are a lot of fun. DA2 had some problems, it did a few things worse than DA:O, but it also featured TONS of improvements. The combat in DA2 is vastly improved over the "pull-kill-repeat" dungeon crawling of DA:O. I had no problem with DA2 being mostly set within a city. That really didn't matter at all to me. It's just a setting. It's like hating Crysis 2 because it's set in a city rather than on an island. The annoying part was the maps being reused, but personally, that wasn't all that big of a deal for me as long as the encounters were different. It's just something they need to address in the next game. Itemization was better in DA2, in my opinion, as DA:O quickly became a mess with all the sorting and equipping. I spent more time going through my inventory than I did playing, it seemed like. However, it still wasn't great. They definitely could have done a better job. Also, some people seem to LIKE all the sorting and filling eight slots for a ton of characters, so perhaps an option there would have been good. I think it was a situation where people expected DA2 to be exactly like DA:O and were not willing to give it a chance because it wasn't. It's funny, because if DA2 had come first, people would have hated DA:O. I played through each at least three times. Once I stopped comparing DA2 to DA:O, it really enjoyed it, and learned to overlook the flaws, just as I had with DA:O. Still, they have a lot they need to improve on with DA3. I just hope they don't throw out the improvements to combat. |
Woo. I want to tell past-pokoko that DA3 turned out well.
| Fusioncode said: Here's mine:
Oh God what the hell was wrong with me. |
It was so bold of you posting this!Also you exposed someone else here and I was looking for these comments of him.:P
I remember them since I was a lurker!:P He posted the same in 2013 and in 2014 despite being refuted every sinlge time!:P
ktay95 on 06 January 2013
I will one day quote this back as my first post on VGChartz, hows it going future me??
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5005929
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
