Here in Mexico women are not required to serve the military but men are and in all the tramits a men require the liberation of the military service to even make the tramit so Im all in for equality in that

Dont know in US but in France, if the father decides he wants to take care of the child while the mother is under X, he cant ask her to pay for the child because she is not related anymore to him legally.

Equality is a strange concept here.

It depends on a plethora of factors, most importantly cost of living. Where I'm from cost of living is ow and $900 a month would be enough for one child. In the city, that isn't true.  But that isn't my point. Having both parents in your life will do so much more to get you out of poverty than getting $400/month, and only maybe if your shitty parent isn't in jail and if the state is garnishing his/her wages, and if he/she doesn't get it reduced. So rather than focus on getting money out of that small minority of rocks, we should focus on having both parents involved in their children's lives. And that means removing barriers which prevent willing non-custodial parents from seeing their children. 

That is fucked up, and represents inequality in my opinion. Why are women so special that they don't need to take care of the child they help create, but men must regardless? 

There is no social movement as big as feminism, so that creates inequality, that's one of the bad things with feminism and any other one sided movement..

Funny people.

In Brazil all men and only men are demanded to serve (and everyone is drafted unless relinquished due to overdraft). Without it besides risking jail time, you can't apply for university, public jobs (and several private ones), have limited access to bank financing, etc. Same for voting (but for this all genders are mandated).

By brazilian law rape is forced penetration of the vagina of a moral woman. So men can't ever be raped, anal sex don't count, whores and skanks can't be either. For all of them it would be forced sex or sexual assault, for which a man would have a hard time to plead against a woman based on strenght and men being able to restrain erection.

On child support. Default to mother unless she relinquish or is proven unfit. Custodial rights for the father is usually two weekend per month. Alymony around 30% the wage. Divorce money depends on full pre-nupcial total separation (which a woman could revert saying she didn't know she was abidicating from anything registered as the husband asset) partial (what is aquired prior to marriage is exempt of division) and universal (anything in the name of any party is halfly divided, even heritage). At rates like 9:1 after divorce the woman claim unable to sustain herself besides alymony she also gets pension/allowance from men based on being the house carer, while man rarely gets it.

On the abortion, which I'm against the pratice but see why the law must allow cases. If your law gives the woman the right to be exempt of motherhood the father should have the same right you can't rule it out by biased claiming men are monster and would run from parenthood while saying woman would only do that in extreme cases, that is unfair threatment. But since you will go to the "it's her body", ok then man can't demand abortion so after born rights are equal right? So why can't the father choose to kill the baby?

All the threat the people unfairly to reach fairness is a pursuit to special rights.

Another example from Brazil... Mother leaves are 4-6 months, father is 5 days. Even though women lives 5years more than men on average in here they can retire 5 years earlier.

In fact the law is sexist and patriarcal most of times in favour of women even if based on the notion that they are weaker and less inteligent. Which biologically (for proof looks on olympiques in physical and nobel in intelect) they are but we want to say they are equal only when it fits ones agenda.

Besides I'm married to a wonderfull woman that also fells disgusted with the unfair privileges of woman, and none would ever leave our child unatended or in divorCE suck the other dry.

Also if someone is so shit that he can't be allowed to be close to child ex-conjuge I wouldn't want any Money and the person should be in jail, or we should accept any idioticity as being unsafe?

And on alimony... A brazil famous that got pregnant of Mike Jagger was able to suck more than 40k month on alimony, for costs like rent 15k/month.

Ka-pie... Women Life is more important than men on these situations because 10 women for 1 men can populate a place. 10 men for 1 woman would lead to death.