LudicrousSpeed said:
Hey look I can make generalizations too! Also, since when does 71 = mediocre? This is the big problem with people looking at scores. Seems anything less than an 8.5 or something is interpreted by some as meaning the game is shit or the score is "mediocre". I bought DC this morning. I played for a few hours, messed around in TT looking at the weather, played a few online events, got to driver level 7 and got the rookie trophy for completing the first chunk of campaign events. So far I think it's an enjoyable racer. The menus and UI are top notch. The sounds are good. The graphics are good. I think they could/should be better, but they're not a negative. I have encountered some of the things the reviewers docked the game big points for though. The penalty system is frustrating and sporaddic. The AI is pretty lackluster in their determination to follow their line, and the way they can tank your car around trying to follow that set line is also frustrating. The handling model is baffling at times. The track design screams arcade racer but the handling is like halfway between arcade and sim. Online racers have, thus far, just been bumper cars as people plow into you over and over again, usually sending you crashing into a barrier or flying off the sacred track (which you are penalized for). The big issue for me is right now I am in the slower paced part of the campaign. If an AI car sideswipes me into an S curve dropping me back four positions in the rookie section, it's no big deal. If that were to happen when I get to the supercar section or on the last lap of an important race, fuck that nonsense. Especially when the AI car drives off scott free and I am penalized with an actual timed speed reduction for it. Another positive I wanna touch on is the loading times are just outstanding. But I can certainly see why reviewers would score the game the way they did. And I don't think a weather patch update (which to me, makes people go gaga mostly because it covers up some of the games more glaring visual flaws) really touches on any of the core flaws people had with the game. |
J, I'm not complaining about the score here (altough I think the game ddeserves 8.5-9 but other people may disagree, and even though it's silly to remove points from things the game never tried to be) just that a lot of people says the game is mediocre, without really trying it.
And sure there is a lot to improve and the hype level made it elevate expectatives. Glad you enjoyed the game so far. I liked the speed of the menus and is simple enough.... the penalty is penalizing... but since I like to race clean, I don't get much penalties... almost never get a corner cut, unless I know that I can really win good time with it. On the bumping, I avoid as much as I can, Sometimes I get the braking point wrong and end up hitting, so it's far to be punished, but I don't like when I got penalized by cars smashing on my rear. But as Sveno said, it was corrected and now they penalize who was wrong by analyzing racing line and speed. Well maybe your AI behaves different tham mine (as I saw Sveno description of his AI being different than what I got)... mine AI really closed the door, raced against one another, raced side by side leaving no room, and sometimes when I braked to hard on a corner I got hitted on the back. I like the aggressiviness of the AI, because normal AI I can get past in like 1min of race and them never bother again (even in top events on GT), and in DC if I race worst on behind the pack slows down for me to pick up, but if I go past them and race perfect they will be right behind me, but if make a mistake in final corner I can lose almost all my positions... I have saw 10s difference in the same race getting in second by 0.5s behind, or getting first with the second 0.5s ahead of AI. Since I play mostly on sim, the driving seemed quite pleasant and easy for me, I just avoided some bad handling cars, I like to do proper corner and race fast by technique not cheer power. I liked most of the track design, lot of variarion and fun to have. I don't like online, but if Svenno news are true then Online will get better due to penalization better applied (altough even now the guy hitting you would get penalized). Until super car I breezed on all races (and third person view is quite easier to race, even more on faster car), then you need to think ahead and avoid all conflict, or you go straight for speed and mash them all and pass all on the beggining, because even if you smash someone in first or second corner you sometimes can get in second and after penalization you have plenty of time to catch up if you do a good race after that.
I didn't read much reviews because I already wanted the game, was going to wait for PS+, but them I had finished all my games, DC was on a good price here (like 60 dollars, that is a good price in here when releases are closer to 80) and I like racing so I bought, don't regret. But they made some undeserved criticism, but that is the right they have. And yes weather change don't change the core of the game (altough it gives a lot of variety to the gameplay) but I didn't saw much flaw in the graphics department, to what you reffer?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."