Your comparison is odd. Do you close your doors if you leave your home? Do you lock the doors of your car if you leave it?

This hacking of Sony revealed that there security concept had many, many flaws in the concept itself so it was possible for the hackers to achieve what is now known around the web. Of course, without the hackers this wouldn't have happened but big companies are constantly a target for hackers and they know they are so yes, partially the victim is also to blame here.

If something actually happened it was either an inside Job or some very very incompetent employees that left open the doors. Incidentally those 2 possibilities are by far the most common "hacks".

But until there is more verifiable information than some torrents and a scary virus in their office I won't be convinced that something sinister actually hapopened.

im okay with some kind of hacking
and this is at least some sort of harmless hacking.
steal a movie pre release is robin hood like.

well i bet the movies is still broken and not yet edited. so then again it useless

The comparison is apt, albeit a tad extreme.  Your comparisons are however, inaccurate.  Since Sony doesn't just 'invite' outside connections, the comparison would be, I leave my home, lock my doors, set the alarms, and someone uses high tech equipment to bypass those systems.  In which case, you'd still be blaming me for not having enough security.  Likewise with a car, it has locks and most of the newer ones not only have alarms, but have key fob's, which require them to be near the car to unlock.  They can and are circumvented, so you'd still be blaming the owner for not having more security.

The problem isn't companies security, or household security, or car security, the problem is, there's no easy way to track down the hackers, or, they exist in countries that are either beyond the arm of international law (North Korea, China, Russia or hell, even in situations like Stuxnet, the US..not like the US or Israel are going to allow Iran access to any of the folks who made it).

The problem here is not what Sony is doing at the door but also inside their house. It is nice to have locked doors in your house if you leave it but if you leave the keys on the table for the locked doors you don't have to lock them in the first place.

Again, there are several flaws in the whole concept and infrastructure behind this hack which wouldn't have been able with better work on Sony's side.

But I guess we won't agree in this case.

No, we won't, you stick up for hackers, I stick up for the victims.  Not many people would agree with you here.

Why would I care for how many people agree with me? If Sony doesn't improve their security concepts and put them on a professional level they will be victims again. It's a bad situation for big companies but you can prevent them - it just depends on how much money you want to spend for it.

Also I am not sticking up for the hackers but I say you can't say that poor Sony is only a victim here without any responsability to enable this big hack.

No, you can't prevent them, if we've learned anything, a motivated hacker, will get in regardless of the security systems you put in place.  The rest of your comment is just more victim blaming, so it's appropriately ignored.  Respond to others, I'm done here.

As I am. It's obvious you don't know anything about security and security concepts so discussing is of no use in this context.