The dellusion is strong in that post. This kind of pokemon game would sell absolutely less than any other Pokemon game. And most important, it would be pointless.

What would death bring about Pokemon? Nothing. Pokemon is a strategic game, which involves catching, long training and breeding. Death would bring nothing to the core game in any aspect, in fact it would deteriorate one of the core gameplay (training).

People wanting a dark story are laughable, because they entirely miss the point off what Pokemon is about.

Taking photos?

I want an online safari zone that is like a Pokemon catching tournament. You can join teams and enter a subgroup of five that compete in catching the most Pokemon or specific ones. These online tournaments can even have themes like a bug or water, or legendaries. Entering a sub-group of five means you travel with five people in real time and have the ability to find hordes in safari when moving close together. You can choose which Pokemon to catch in the horde even though you couldn't in single player. You'll have to complete a simple puzzle before you select which Pokemon to catch. Other people could be catching the Pokemon before you finish the puzzle, though. This adds competition and also hides latency difference/issues .

I also want a randomized and Nuzlocke mode that opens after you enter the Hall of Fame. They can restrict it to single-player only so you can't trade any rare Pokemon found to normal mode.

Seeing how easy my ideas can be implemented in future Pokemon games, I hope GameFreak adds them or something similar in the future games....

Woah bro HGSS had a great engine.

I think.

I dont actually know what I'm arguing

Eh, the "open world pokemon of all regions/pokemon mmo" idea is asked all the time and always dumb for reasons I cant go into now but will when I get on a better computer.

It was a perfected Gen IV engine. as they say, You can polish a turd, but it'll still be a turd. In this case, it turned out decent, but compared to something like BW or RSE, it's bad.

I find a lot of things in HGSS are pretty great, even compared to BW myself. What specifically are you refering to when you say the engine sucks. Sort of a noob.

Ever played Diamond/Pearl? They're slow as all ass. Platinum was faster, and HGSS were even better, but the design flaws of DPP still echoed.

No, but I do know Platinum was indeed slow as ass.

I might just have a soft spot for HGSS why I give it so much slack, but I do. Stuff like the Bag in HGSS being better than in any pokemon game before or since are the reason though.

I really don't see where these imaginary costs would be coming from to make it more then GTA V? The game would comparable to any other open world game filled with distinct locations, NPC and Monsters. Infact the more simplistic artsyle will make it far easier then those comparable games. The only thing they'd need to be wary of is how many pokemon to include, instead of having all gens they would have to  opt for a select 250 Pokemon. And lets be honest, modelling and animating the likes of pickachu, squirtle and  geodude isn't exactly gonna be as tasking as creature set in a realistic fantasy world.  Also if you look at something like GTA huge expensive go into the cinematics, presumably this game wouldn't be too heavy on that.

It would be a huge undertaking no doubt, but not impossibly expensive. They could make their money of course, just not on a tiny userbase like the Wii U. I imagine they'd need to sell 4m upwards for such a title to break even (assuming they go all out on the visuals like the pokemon battle revolution teaser trailer)