By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - After playing ORAS, I have a huge problem with IGN's review

Firstly, her review is so vague it could be used for the original Ruby and Sapphire with minor changes. Secondly, she never once states that there are frame rate issues -- even with 3D off and there's no Battle Frontier! Don't you think those are pretty major problems? Instead her negatives are Game Freak staying faithful to the originals with the HMs, Secret Power, and water routes. She rambles on about how 'cute' things are -- as if that's going to help someone get an idea of what the game is like. It's really quite an embarrassing review.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/11/18/pokemon-alpha-sapphire-and-omega-ruby-review



"On my business card I am a corporate president. In my mind I am a game developer. But in my heart I am a gamer." - Satoru Iwata

Around the Network

Well water is a pretty important subject, I mean, if you can't swim, you probably want to stay away from this game!

But yea, its IGN, sometimes their reviews make sense while others its like, wtf, how did u miss this or how did u not mention that



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

- Too much water.



I came here to say water.



My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first. 

Did somebody say water?