None taken... I don't see why I would be angry or frustrated since I'm married and love my with. Just can't stand all the bullshit left wingers throw us with their "feminist, gayzist, minorities, etc" BS at ever opportunity they can, spinning facts to fit their agenda.

Most women, as in like the 99% of them that I've met aren't "feminazis", I think there's a sub-set of men who have their own issues with women (most notably not being able to get laid) that make a giant stink of it.

I would doubt more than 1% of the population wold be made by the boring people of any of those moviments. Of course there are men with problems with women and vice-versa, I just don't see what that have any to do with anything... and if this post is an second answer to my post that you didn't put in the quote... if it is, please make it direct.

Discrimination against women, homosexuals, and some minorities are very real problems.

The writer of the OP article is an extremist, no more representative of the entire left wing than pedophile priests or the Westboro Baptist Church are representative of the whole Christian religion.

They already do censor everything and they have for many years, but censorship is a bit pointless now because of the internet. I don't think taking the sex out of Gta would make it a worse game (do you?).

"Think of the children" not the IN thing to say, that's why there is more & more cases of abuse. Adults should grow up and think of the children

"They already do censor everything and they have for many years"

can you give me examples of the censorship you are speaking of?

" I don't think taking the sex out of Gta would make it a worse game (do you?)."

you are missing the point it is about progression its about saying that today we will take the prostitues out 

tomorrow we will take the shooting out

next week we will take out the right to wear t shirts depicting women with their shoulders out

the game is for adults there should be no need to censor it that is what we have the ratings for

it is the responsiblity of parents to manage what content their children have access to

censorship in this case is where we decide that parents cannot be responsible and so we penalise everybody

i say no we should hold the parents accountable and stop proceding down this nonsensical socialist path where we sacrifice so many freedoms to the state because it is determined that we can't be responsible or that someone is offended or some other garbage

and to keep this balanced we must mention the even larger subset of men that are unable to criticise women because they value the approval of women over truth or objectivity

i find both groups to be quite frankly pathetic

and i find the shaming tactic of "oh you can't get laid and that's why you're saying that" to be a very common tool in terms of silencing any man that points out the harm that feminism is causing

because again people understand how fragile the male ego is and how dependent it is on the approval of women

what i want you to understand though is that using that as a way of attacking men is actually dehumanising to women

the insult is that the man has failed to obtain sexual access a woman and because of that hes angry

which obviously reflects badly on him but it also implies that a woman's sexuality is her most valuable asset to offer

which is rather ironic when you consider that women use this insult so often while saying that they don't want to be valued for their sexuality

what both groups of men need to do is to stop looking for validation of themselves through women and the instant they do so they can be objective about this issue

So much truth in here.

That reminded me of that girl that went into a rage and broke her boyfriends 360. What did she say. "No sex for a month".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_regionally_censored_video_games