By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Interstellar.... OMG. go watch the movie NOW. *SPOILERS INSIDE*

SvennoJ said:
sc94597 said:
nanarchy said:
 

Not going to go into them all, but some of the obvious fails and plot holes.

a planet with waves of that height would have such massive tidal forces at play that it would tear the planet apart.

This is not true. http://ikjyotsinghkohli24.wordpress.com/2014/11/07/on-the-science-of-interstellar/

I was just reading through the comment section of that article. Fascinating discussions I can hardly understand half of. I didn't know about Kerr black holes before this movie or that there were so many competing mathematical and astrophysical theories about them. Too bad the comment section closed just when they started hammering the guy on what would actually be needed to get off the planet back to 'normal' time.

It's still a dumb decision to even look at that planet as a viable site. One more point, even if it was a suitable planet, they would have hardly started unpacking the first shuttle before the rest of plan 'A' people would start showing up. Massive traffic jam due to time dilation! Not very suitable for plan B either when any dangerous outside event now occurs 60.000 times more often. A 100 years would be over 6 million 'outside' years. That's a lot of possible comet strikes.

It was a plot device in the end. They needed the time to go away quickly. They could have visited a couple planets instead with long hypersleep journeys. This was more original, faster and more flashy/messy. Plus it got people talking about Kerr black holes.

This movie released just in time for me lol. Three of my credits as a physics major for this semester are on a research topic of my choice. I was fascinated with the concept of Kerr Black-Holes after watching Steins: Gate and then reading about how the ergosphere allows one to extract energy from the black hole. So I decided to make my project about describing the various types of black hole states: charged/uncharged, rotating/non-rotating. Of course that meant I had to actually "learn" a lot of geometry/topology that I was not familiar with, at least on the conceptual level.  General Relativty I have to say is much more intriguing and beautiful than even Special Relativity. I hope to take a proper General Relativity course next year (my Senior year.) Anyway, I just finished the project, and will be editing it for a few weeks and then I must present it to my class in a lecture format. So this movie just reinvigorated my motivation. I think I might add a little tidbit or use some scenes in my powerpoint. Or I can tinker with the mathematica program used to model the black-hole in the movie, but I doubt I'd get too far with that. 



Around the Network
nanarchy said:
I saw Interstellar on the weekend, man it sucked. So many plot holes, physics fails and scenes and story that was excessively dragged out. Reminded me of Gravity (but not 'quite' as bad). It seems they took multiple movie plots and slammed them together without much thought to how it would work.


Actually a majority of the physics was solid but what do I know, you got your Doctors degree right?

Most movies don't even try, So I was surprised by how much was real. First movie have seen where they actually made space quit, because there is no sound in space.



I got a Kindle e-reader early this year and with Amazon Prime I get one book every month, all Arthur C Clarke work is for free.

It was amazing seeing bits of 2001-2010-3001, Rama and Fountains of Paradise throughtout the movie.





I love The Onion's review of Interstellar its one of the funniest videos they had recently.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9X_sXWoKJE&list=UUfAOh2t5DpxVrgS9NQKjC7A