Landguy said:
I agree, the point of thanking a veteran or active duty military person is to appreciate that their sacrifice has been made to give you or your family the opportunity to have peace. Armistace Day, the day that the peace agreements were signed to end a World War. To get to that day, many people sacrificed not just a little food or a weekend helping others or donating to a worthy cause. They made the ultimate sacrifice(or trade in your thoughts) - they sacrificed their lives for ours and many others to have the life we have today.
Unfortunately, without having as military presence as a deterent, all of the peace that prevails over a majority of the world would not exist. Some day, there may be no need of the worlds military. We can only hope that day comes sooner rahter than later.
|
I wish it were that simple, but unfortunately in my eyes those sacrifices are too high of a cost for the minimal advantage that might've been gained to the average person. I don't value people throwing their lives away for the cause of a state. I find it very unfortunate, and impersonal. It is a very collectivist mindset with a disrespect for the individual. World War I did not happen because of the familes of the men who died had ill will towards the people these men were fighting, it happened because of a conflict among elites and the powerful in the respective countries. The actions of both sides of men showed a surrender of individual moral responsibility to these authories as well, which I don't value. If there is any emotion I have for the soldiers who die it is sadness and a sense of lossed potential, not thankfulness. These wars were not defensive nor were they productive endeavors, so it isn't like I or anybody else I know gained anything from them. They are the accumulation of decades (even centuries) of bad feelings and overly strong alliances between a few thousand persons in respective countries.
That is beside the point, though. My point is that it isn't the sacrifice that makes such actions good and virtuous (to me), it is the summed effects of the actions. I don't thank a doctor who heals me because he/she went to college and medical school for many years (sacrificing part of his/her life), must be on call for very long hours, has emotional trauma from the deaths of patients, and experiences a considerable amount of stress, etc, etc. I thank the doctor because he/she healed me. The same is true for the veterans. If a veteran protects me, my family, friends, or even a stranger I don't know from being murdered, stolen from, or enslaved by an aggressor I'd thank them not because they are a "veteran" who sacrificed a part of themselves, but because they did the right thing by protecting somebody from an aggressor. Having an insignia, epaulettes, and/or being employed by an institution which specializes in defense (or any other market) doesn't make a difference for me when considering a good act. There are many "civilians" who do such acts. There are many "veterans" who do such acts. I thank those individuals. There are also many civilians and many veterans who have not done those acts (even if they would when presented with the situation.)
But, I don't want to get off-topic in your thread which is meant for people to thank veterans. I just wanted to express why I don't thank veterans for being veterans in title, and how I like to celebrate armistice day by thanking (in my mind) all of those people who helped end such a war rather than perpetuate it (both types exist among military and civilians.)