Forgot that one as well. Thanks! Hopefully all of these will be available on eShop or online retailers in the future.

You can ask any Wii U gamer if they want only games published by Nintendo. 

Not the case. Not even remotely.

What Wii U owners want are unique quality games. Not halfbacked ports which which are there because the eninge used works on the Wii U too.

Zombii U failed because the reviews weren't that good. It's like the first Red Steel. Right direction but somehow flawed execution.

What bribery? That's just you speculating, no facts.

With your logic, PS4 and X1 games shouldn't sell better than PS360 games because of the smaller userbase. But it happens often.

Decrease in sales doesn't equte to failure. Poor numbers like AC on Wii U is failure. ACIV on PS3 and 360 still sold great, multi million sellers, and that's why AC:Rouge is coming. The Wii U's ACIV was a failure and its not getting AC:Rogue.

Mario Kart 8 will never achieve the sales of past Mario Kart games. But if its very profitable, then its a success. Simple as that.

Porting from 360 to Wii U is the easiest and cheapest. X1, PS4 and PC use a x86 CPU while the Wii U uses a Power PC CPU and the power difference is big so a lot has to be re-done for the port to exists.

The trick with the sales is that each third party game needs around 125k-150k at FULL PRICE to just cover the costs, but the companies actually want to make a profit not just cover the costs, a decent profit will require around 250k-300k at full price to "make it worth it" which means that only 4 to 6 multiplataform ports have actually make a decent profit on the console and a few have actually lost by porting their games... like Deus Ex, Splinter Cell, Re: Revelations, Injustice, Darksiders 2, Batman: Arkham Origins and a few others that reached their current numbers at bargain price.

Is just too much of a risk when the succesful rate is so low, a shame because a few good ports just got slaughtered on the console. It is simple math, is not worth it to port for the console from the PS3 and 360, is even worse from the PS4 and X1.

it's not speculation.

what? I didn't say a higher base always guarantee more sales than on other platforms.

what about rogue? looks like it will sell very little. if it does, will you call it a failure and say the audience idn't there?

mario kart 8 will outsell most past iterations.

I just see claims of bribery and no facts.

You use userbase as an excuse for abysmal sales. Hence, you feel the sales of multiplat core games have been good because the Wii U userbase is small. It doesn't work that way. Publishers are more concerned of how many units the console can move, not the attach rate.

AC:Rogue will likely be the poorest selling AC game on those consoles, but the odds of them selling over million on both PS3 and 360 is high. But based on trends, AC:Rogue would be lucky to hit 300K on Wii U.

Now that PS360 software sales are dwindling they have begun to lose support. No point in supporting Wii U when it can't even achieve the dwindling PS360 software sales.

Well... its gonna take a lot of bundles for Mario Kart 8 to achieve that.

you keep saying "abysmal" to exaggerate numbers. and I'm saying installed base is growing, and if games covered it's costs when the base was at it's lowest, they can profit a lot from now on.

you mean 1 million when combining ps360 sales, right? cause I don't see rogue selling even close to 1 million on either system.

"No point in supporting Wii U when it can't even achieve the dwindling PS360 software sales." yeah, because dwindling sales on 70+ million bases is a fair comparisson against one that had less than 4m when the last big multi released.

you don't know about Mario Kart sales, do you? surpassing double dash and super circuit should be easy. and it will probably surpass super mario kart, mk 64 and mk 7.

If that was the case, it would still be wrong. as a 3rd party, SE is the dependant one and shoul make games in order to make money. it's absurd for a 3rd party to demand money before making the games.