DJEVOLVE said: Yes they did all of it because of poor sales... I'm not fighting that... ^^^^ to all posts. Loll Not sure if I missed something. |
Fair enough. x3 It's nothing about you specifically, I just see the occasional sentiment crop up in the Internets from the more, er, vigorous Xbox supporters that 'Pffft, no, the sales weren't poor! Doesn't matter to them if Sony's in the lead! Microsoft just wants to give gamers choices! Not cause they don't think they have enough sales, but cause they're all generous and FLUFFY!' Given I'm of the firm opinion that anything any company does (be it the bundles for Microsoft, the Instant Game Collection with Sony, etc,) is to benefit the company by increasing value, that kind of talk just drives me up the wall a little. =P
Anyway, it can be hard to tell between the ones who just want to specify the distinction between a price cut and a value-boosting bundle or such, and the occasional one who's trying to say 'They didn't lower the price, this isn't because they don't like where their sales are!' So I apologize for nitpicking.
Since we don't seem to disagree on anything, I think our work here is done. =D
Zanten, Doer Of The Things
Unless He Forgets In Which Case Zanten, Forgetter Of The Things
Or He Procrascinates, In Which Case Zanten, Doer Of The Things Later
Or It Involves Moving Furniture, in Which Case Zanten, F*** You.