Difficult one to say. Smash will likely end up in the high 80's to the low 90's, the same can be said for LBP, and Master chief the same.

But Master chief will likely review well because of the value proposition, just like the Orange box a few years ago

I'll say smash, because I want it to be the highest rated game.

1. Super Smash Bros. Wii U (~91%) - "Universal Acclaim" is pretty much inevitable

2. Halo: MCC (~87%) - despite its excellent value, I get the feeling that Halo: Reach will be the final game in the franchise to receive "Universal Acclaim"

3. LittleBigPlanet 3 (~81%) - if Media Molecule was developing this game, my prediction would be a lot higher

Damn, why're you all underestimating LBP? It'll likely get more than 90.

I think Smash>LBP3>MCC (Only because it's a remaster. Remasters of several years old games tend to review considerably lower than their original releases. The quality though, that's something else.)

while i think Little Big Planet in the end will have the lowest scores of the 3 but i am having trouble deciding between halo and smash but i am expecting to be around either 89 to 93 on Metacritc

i think the reason people is cause its a different developer this time and usually when that happens that game is usually the worst review in the series like look at recent examples being Batman Arkham Origins and Borderlands The Presequel 

It's not being developed by Media Molecule, who made the first two games. Instead, it's being developed by Sumo Digital, who recently made the crappy Xbox 360 version of Forza Horizon 2.

But it is, because it's my thread.

I actually think all three will be in the 90+ range, but I personally think it would be a scandal if MCC does not receive like 93+, which would probably put it just above Smash and LBP.

Smash WiiU (91-94)> Halo MCC (89-92) > LBP3 ( 86-89)

Smash 90-90
MCC 85-90
LBP3 80-85