By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Did Nintendo make the right move with the staggered Smash Bros. releases?

 

What do you think?

Yes 147 86.47%
 
No 23 13.53%
 
Total:170
Screamapillar said:
The userbase of the 3DS is a nice thing for Nintendo to have, but I don't think it has much to do with the discussion at hand. By it's very nature, the 3DS version would never have been able to have all of the features the Wii U version has. So install base doesn't really matter. Nintendo made the best games they could with the consoles they have on the market.

I think the staggered release was appropriate. I think Nintendo probably wanted the 3DS version to come out even earlier in the year, like July or August, in order to give the game some additional breathing room. It really only has six or seven weeks before it's superior counterpart is on the market. But, it is what it is.

I think ultimately the Wii U version will sell as well, if not better than the 3DS version, because of the quality of the title, and also because Smash Bros is very much a "play with everyone on the TV in the living room" game. You can kind of already see that in the sales of the 3DS version. A lot of people are clearly holding off and waiting for the console version. I didn't think there would be a lot of double dipping and I don't think there will be come November/ December either. Amiibo being Wii U-only at the moment also cements that.

Smash Bros 3DS has sold through to... roughly 6% of the 3DS base at this time? That's really good, but I think the percentage of Wii U owners and new buyers of the Wii U getting Smash Bros will be significantly greater than that. I think it will sell more consoles and be owned by more Wii U owners than Mario Kart 8.

@Bold2 - I have no doubt that percentage-wise, the Wii U version will sell more, but 6% of the 3DS userbase is equal to 40% of the Wii U userbase. Going back to the first bolded point, garnering interest from an equivalent number of users that would make up 40% of the Wii U userbase could bring in more hardware and software sales on the Wii U, so it's very relevant. By giving a superior experience on the Wii U, there is more incentive to make the plunge for those who would otherwise be satisfied with just the 3DS version, had they been more similar.

The question is, unfortunately not answerable without observation of an alternate universe in which Smash Bros. 3DS never existed: Will Nintendo sell more consoles and copies of Smash Bros. Wii U (from enticing 3DS players who otherwise would have passed) than they have lost (by giving 3DS players the game on their handheld, assuming they don't double dip)?



Around the Network
curl-6 said:
Putting it on 3DS at all was a dumb move.

Releasing the 3DS version first was the moronic icing on the imbecile cake.


So much rage. I thought you'd calmed down after the game wasn't delayed to 2015 as had originally been driving you.



I skipped the 3DS version in favour of the Wii U , for me Smash has always been more of a home console experience. The direct confirmed my belief that the Wii U version would be by far more superior and stuffed with content.



Brilliant move, Smash appeals to a lot of younger people and teenagers who still get video-games and consoles as Christmas presants from their parents. Smash Brothers 3DS was an ad for the Wii U and Smash Bros. being released for this holiday season.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

For Nintendo in total and 3DS it was the right move, but for WiiU it was a really bad move.
So as I mainly see SSB as an home console game i voted for No.



Around the Network

Just a sneak peek. Everyone likes sneak peeks.